name='Thunderer' said:
So when it would be released. Also, was searching the web and found that whoever buys a windows after a certain day this month would have to purchase the SP1 cd. Now my question is that since I did not active mine due to the fact that I did not build my PC since I pre-ordered my Q9450, would I be able to install SP1 without having to buy an additional Product-Key???
Hmm, I`d seriously doubt it, it`s a KB file. Or they are single KB files for the architecture u`ve installed. Similarly u can uninstall it - bizarrely enough for something that was meant to `move the earth` for Vista.
name='teknokid' said:
Ive already got it, noticed no difference so far...
.....
name='Kempez' said:
RTM isn't officially out yet, but there are some people who will have access to it
Well this is the thing, I don`t have it as in me personally. But I do have it in the sense that professionally I have it/them. As in for 32 & 64 bit. Privately I can use it, but I can`t/won`t for example give it to Fred at this point. Although Fred will be able to get it sooner than he may think. Other than that, I have no nda or anything. Not like other freakin things u can`t talk about.
So that out of the way.
Does take a whole long time to install it. Not like previous service packs. It by all accounts closes down Vista`s backbone and instigates itself like a raw OS install. i.e. restarts after unravelling itself on ur drive and runs bare minimum stuff on execution.
The Defrag tool now lets u select the drives individually in the form of a tick list.
My Blu-Ray drive is in the file lister as a Blu-Ray Drive by name, probably a driver thing. (actually using the same driver, so it must be the explorer-handler)
This is not going to be something u can slipstream btw. You want Vista SP1 as a package, you will have to buy it as such. Which to be fair I think Thunderer may`ve been referring to. Wild how the initial install of Vista goes real quick, then u can w8 an hour+ for the SP1 to apply.
Doesn`t appear u can install it on a previously slipstreamed Vista install. Can`t confirm that for fact, only that the 1 I tried failed.
Driver issues have popped up. - but here`s the thing. What the m$ guy was trying to say was that the SP1 re-installs drivers. I said that`s crap, it merely pulls them out of the way, installs itself, then puts them back. Technically that`s correct, it`s gone quiet as to it not being correct. If u reinstall the drivers urself, everything is fine. So drivers don`t need to change, they`re just not handled with care in some cases by the SP1. Imo, best approach is a new install and not apply SP1 to an existing Vista setup with all the drivers installed. Can be tricky for some cases where u ask something to upd8 ur drivers for u, and it tells u u have the right drivers.
Performance wize, I haven`t seen the quoted "big improvement" people are talking about in the circle, I don`t honestly know where this is coming from. Two machines I`ve tried it on myself have the same memory footprint, the one now takes an absolute age to come out of the locked status. U move the mouse or something and the monitor takes a longer time to acknowledge, almost long enough for u to think it`s literally locked up. Could be specifically to that pc tho, not all of mine are setup to use auto-shut-off of monitors so I can`t say.
Looks like the bug where it would leave an empty folder behind after u tried to move it and one of the files was busy - then u "unbusied" it has gone.
Bit undetermined whether file movement is slicker or not cos the major file moving pc I use has DirectoryOpus on it, which improved over explorer generally anyway.
.. frankly as I discover stuff I`ll post it here.