S_I_N
New member
there are some here who think minimum is fine while other like SieB and myself (and others) who would steer you towards the true goals of things which for water cooling is if you dont do it right why bother at all. As I have said from the get go the formula while maybe looking like it bears meaning is just random numbers The user assign themselves without thought of what they should point to. A correct understanding of water cooling should include many variables. Like amount of heat to be dispersed pump flow and head fans used are amoung the important items to consider. Just because someone did it does not mean it will work for everyone. Ambient temps play a very important part in any cooling scenario.
As stated a 360 thick rad will do the job but with the added nuisance of noisy fans to assist it. There are quiet fans that may hold the temps decent (not best) the better solution is to use a 360 and 240 to cool so the fans can be kept low and quiet. Which is the ultimate goal to water cooling to be cool and quiet.
M&P I'm sorry if it seems like i attacked your formula but imho I cant put my mind around those figures without explaination of where they come from. you say what each stands for but not how you came about assigning the values
As stated a 360 thick rad will do the job but with the added nuisance of noisy fans to assist it. There are quiet fans that may hold the temps decent (not best) the better solution is to use a 360 and 240 to cool so the fans can be kept low and quiet. Which is the ultimate goal to water cooling to be cool and quiet.
M&P I'm sorry if it seems like i attacked your formula but imho I cant put my mind around those figures without explaination of where they come from. you say what each stands for but not how you came about assigning the values