NeverBackDown
AMD Enthusiast
Not sure why you guys are expecting much from a refresh.
As far as the Ryzne 2800X rumours go, I can only conclude that they are fake.
The first media mention is on KitGuru and they never mentioned it in an article, only in a video.
The real source is from over a month ago on reddit at r/AyyMD, a satirical subreddit that does nothing but make fun of AMD fanboys and other tech companies.
Also remember that 12nm is just 14nm+, with expected 10% performance improvements with the same power consumption or a 15% power reduction with the same performance over 14nm and a minor increase in circuit density. That does not leave room for 4 more cores and eight extra threads.
Not sure why you guys are expecting much from a refresh.
If the 12 core part is correct then I'm expecting performance in multi threaded workloads to scale, I'm only expecting a minor IPS increase, Nothing drastic.
Not sure why you guys are expecting much from a refresh.
If the 12 core part is correct then I'm expecting performance in multi threaded workloads to scale, I'm only expecting a minor IPS increase, Nothing drastic.
Maxwell to Pascal really can't be compared. Nvidia spent millions (supposedly billions) increasing the efficiency of their architecture, something AMD does not have the capital to do. Nvidia went from an ageing 28nm to a very efficient 16nm. And despite what we've seen, Pascal is a new architecture. However you want to look at it, it is still a new architecture and Ryzen 2 isn't.
Basically this. Was also why I didn't even bother to reply. Alien seems to have a 10,000 word response for everything lately. I don't have the attention span for that.
Maxwell to Pascal really can't be compared. Nvidia spent millions (supposedly billions) increasing the efficiency of their architecture, something AMD does not have the capital to do. Nvidia went from an ageing 28nm to a very efficient 16nm. And despite what we've seen, Pascal is a new architecture. However you want to look at it, it is still a new architecture and Ryzen 2 isn't. GF's new 12nm is indeed said to be very efficient, but I don't see why they'll add additional cores when it's mostly clock speed that was holding back Ryzen.
Ultimately we don't need 12 cores on the mainstream platform. We don't even need 5Ghz. AMD could be conservative like they were with Ryzen (assumedly) and aim for a 4Ghz base and 4.5Ghz boost and still do really well. Good silicon might be able to overclock on all cores to 4.6Ghz. That's a worthy upgrade for those on an R5 1600. I know I'd strongly consider an 8-core 4.6Ghz R7 2700 over my 4Ghz 6-core 1600X. The beauty of Ryzen was that it offered great performance at every level, from the enthusiast (6900K) to the more budget conscious (7350K). It gave people an upgrade path. Intel never really offered that. If you wanted more cores then you had to switch platform.
A more apt comparison would be Haswell to Devil's Canyon. Intel simply improved the manufacturing process. No, it wasn't a die shrink, but technically 14nm to 12nm isn't much of a die shrink either.
Also, if a 12c/24t CPU is released in three months time for $450, what on earth is Zen 2 in 2019 going to bring? Where do you go from there? You've already got a CPU so powerful that it would dwarf everything. If there's going to be a 12c/24t CPU coming to the mainstream market, it'll be with Zen 2 and won't clock to 5.1Ghz and it won't cost $450. That's my 2c.
I don't think you should have to apologise for explaining yourself. I enjoy reading your posts.
Sharing code?
It's a free Engine... Don't see how that claim works. The others are something else worth looking into
I want to try and come off the Venlaflaxine soon. I am pretty sure that is the cause.