SPS
Moderator
Your link takes me to the about:blank page!
Just testing the moderator reflexes this morning Feronix

Fixed

Your link takes me to the about:blank page!
I'd pre-load it but got no time to play it unfortunately![]()
Minimum Requirements for 720p30 at low settings:
OS: 64-bit Windows 7 or later
Processor: Intel Core i3-4130 or equivalent with 4 hardware threads
Memory: 6GB RAM
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB, AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB, or equivalent DX11 compatible GPU with 2GB of memory
Hard Drive: 30 GB free space
Recommended Requirements for 1080p60 at high settings:
OS: 64-bit Windows 7 or later
Processor: Intel Core i5-4690 or equivalent with 4 hardware threads
Memory: 8GB RAM
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB, AMD Radeon R9 290 4GB, or equivalent DX11 compatible GPU with 4GB of memory
Hard Drive: 30 GB free space
source
Its quite a demanding game it seems. I'm a bit worried that my rig is below 108060p high settings and I have a 1440p screen...
8/8 would repost again.
A 780Ti has got to be better than an a 290/970 in anyones money, what you chatting.
JR
Nah. You get all the heat of a 290 with less memory.
A single card of that power doesn't need more than 3GB and neither should games, GTA V runs ultra at 4k (no AA) with 3GB. And yeah the same heat but a better cooler
JR
If the standard was 32GB VRAM, games would play a lot smoother and look a lot nicer.
Maybe then GTAV wouldn't have such crappy ground/terrain textures.
A single card of that power doesn't need more than 3GB and neither should games, GTA V runs ultra at 4k (no AA) with 3GB. And yeah the same heat but a better cooler
JR
I like AA.I also play ARMA 3 which goes to 2.9+GB on the settings I use at 1440p. Why would I want to have a sweaty card that will be useless at my resolution/settings?
I know, but unlike you I'm having vram issues at a lower resolution.I said 4k :mellow:
If your life is that bad why not just get a 290?
JR
I know, but unlike you I'm having vram issues at a lower resolution.
No AMD atm because bad blower coolers innit.
Bad coolers on the 290/290x yeah but the new ones are very good. Was impressed by my 390x XFX unit I had a while back, was quiet and kept it from going over 77C in games. The extra vram would help you a lot though if you are having trouble at 3GB which is a plus. I'd probably wait it out till Polaris or Pascal though. Seeing as they are not that far away and with 14/16nm finfet heat probably won't be bad with either company.
Was the 390 a blower style cooler or the normal DD card? I can't run a non blower style card in my case unless said card is low-ish TDP.
If things go well I'm going dual GPU tbh. I'm hoping the FuryX2/980x2 are going to be good cards as I think that is the next way forward for me.
Oh dear Asus
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2016/02/24/ftc-asus-20-years-monitoring/1
I was going to go for a Asus router when I had the money but, I think I will wait till they have secured there routers better if this is story is accurate.
Oh dear Asus
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2016/02/24/ftc-asus-20-years-monitoring/1
I was going to go for a Asus router when I had the money but, I think I will wait till they have secured there routers better if this is story is accurate.