Erkki Muhonen
New member
Last edited by a moderator:
[OFFICIAL] OC3D Overclockers Club
- Thread starter AverageNinja
- Start date
RamboOC
Suspended By Request of Police
I recommend you to have the same nickname on the cpu-z submission as your forum name otherwise AverageNinja won't be able to tell if it was you that made the submission. Right now the nick on your submission is "WAKTBIKKJA-PC".
Erkki Muhonen
New member
good idea, i will sort that out in a moment
i clocked back down to 4,4 now, and its not as cool as 4,6
here it is then: http://valid.x86.fr/xib99t
i clocked back down to 4,4 now, and its not as cool as 4,6here it is then: http://valid.x86.fr/xib99t
Last edited:
AdmiralDonut
New member
RizeAllard
New member
Oh! Now i have to go home and make some OC...
Ofan
New member
NoPrisoners
New member
http://valid.x86.fr/4kn3rw
rebuilt the computer, first time having a play with the manual settings. Think it has some more to go.
rebuilt the computer, first time having a play with the manual settings. Think it has some more to go.
Frankz
New member
Guess I'll join in on this one =)!
http://valid.x86.fr/txzd46
This is my fully stable OC
Cache Freq: 4.0 Ghz
Cache Voltage: 1.255
VCCSA: 1.05
DRAM Voltage: 1.355
CPU Input Voltage: 1.92
LLC: 6
http://valid.x86.fr/txzd46
This is my fully stable OC
Cache Freq: 4.0 Ghz
Cache Voltage: 1.255
VCCSA: 1.05
DRAM Voltage: 1.355
CPU Input Voltage: 1.92
LLC: 6
That cache is high - its only needed for massive memory speeds - if youre not running 3000+ Id try knocking that back
CalVic
Member
Been a few day's with my new 4790k and Maximums VII Formula Z97.
I've not dived deep into the settings, only just to the basic's thus far.
100% Rock solid at these settings:
4.8Ghz with 1.225v
4.5Ghz Cache with 1.15v
Avexir 2133Mhz @ 2400 with 10-12-12-21 1T (Benched 35GB/s Read)
CPU-Z:
http://valid.x86.fr/109mjx
I've not dived deep into the settings, only just to the basic's thus far.
100% Rock solid at these settings:
4.8Ghz with 1.225v
4.5Ghz Cache with 1.15v
Avexir 2133Mhz @ 2400 with 10-12-12-21 1T (Benched 35GB/s Read)
CPU-Z:
http://valid.x86.fr/109mjx
Last edited:
Kaapstad
Active member
See if you can get VCCSA down a bit too
Both of my 5960Xs run 3200mhz+ memory
On one I set it to 0.9v
On the other one I leave it on auto @0.872v
Thelosouvlakia
Classy-Fried-Chicken
Do I get in the club with this? http://valid.x86.fr/el3zbc
Frankz
New member
Yea you're right about that, however it's not my daily OC. That OC is the highest stable one I managed to get while using voltages and keeping temps I'm comfortable with. I'll only switch to that profile when I actually need the extra horsepower
My daily OC is just a basic 4.0Ghz at 1.075v(adaptive voltage), 2400 XMP ram profile and the cache isn't overclocked, it gets the job done
.Yea, I have tried lowering the vccsa but i'll get boot problems, it wont POST & i get a Q-code which points to the VCCSA. I do want to mention that this is 15-15-15-35-2t 2400MHz rated RAM, took me a while to tweak all the settings to get stable(500% hci memtest pass) at 15-15-15-40-1t 3000mhz on 100BCLK
Last edited:
I'd like to be added, please.
My best on this chip is in the validation in my sig, granted that's still a bit unstable... I did finish tweaking my 24/7's on this one today, and here's what I have (i7-4790K):
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
24/7 safe, unconditionally stable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.4 GHz @ 1.181Vcore / 4.2 GHz @ 1.130Vring / 1.800Vrin
4.5 GHz @ 1.200Vcore / 4.2 GHz @ 1.130Vring / 1.800Vrin
4.6 GHz @ 1.245Vcore / 4.4 GHz @ 1.240Vring / 1.900Vrin
4.7 GHz @ 1.295Vcore / 4.4 GHz @ 1.240Vring / 1.900Vrin
I just did the final uncore/ring bus/cache on the 4.4 and 4.5 today.
Six weeks to compile the above list... I think 4.8 is doable, but I need better cooling, or need to tweak the IO voltages as well... Either way, 4.8 runs too hot for my blood and H100i GTX (peaks in the low 90's in prime). 4.9 and 5.0 boot, but don't handle loads too well, and both may get stable above 1.4, and i see that as unacceptable for anything but short benching and validation...5.0 is stable somewhere above 1.425 (BSOD there under any stress).
Still, 4.4-4.7 all suitable for 24/7 isn't that bad.
Opinions? How do these fit in with the pack here? My research seems to tell me mine isn't outstanding, but it's a tad better than the mean on the bell curve.
My best on this chip is in the validation in my sig, granted that's still a bit unstable... I did finish tweaking my 24/7's on this one today, and here's what I have (i7-4790K):
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
24/7 safe, unconditionally stable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.4 GHz @ 1.181Vcore / 4.2 GHz @ 1.130Vring / 1.800Vrin
4.5 GHz @ 1.200Vcore / 4.2 GHz @ 1.130Vring / 1.800Vrin
4.6 GHz @ 1.245Vcore / 4.4 GHz @ 1.240Vring / 1.900Vrin
4.7 GHz @ 1.295Vcore / 4.4 GHz @ 1.240Vring / 1.900Vrin
I just did the final uncore/ring bus/cache on the 4.4 and 4.5 today.
Six weeks to compile the above list... I think 4.8 is doable, but I need better cooling, or need to tweak the IO voltages as well... Either way, 4.8 runs too hot for my blood and H100i GTX (peaks in the low 90's in prime). 4.9 and 5.0 boot, but don't handle loads too well, and both may get stable above 1.4, and i see that as unacceptable for anything but short benching and validation...5.0 is stable somewhere above 1.425 (BSOD there under any stress).
Still, 4.4-4.7 all suitable for 24/7 isn't that bad.
Opinions? How do these fit in with the pack here? My research seems to tell me mine isn't outstanding, but it's a tad better than the mean on the bell curve.
Last edited:
Hello?
Oh, and downsize my cache to 4.2 GHz across the board @ 1.150V
The 4.4 GHz cache proved long-term unstable. Been stable ever since at 4.7 GHz @1.295Vcore / 4.2 GHz Cache/Ring @ 1.150Vring
AverageNinja
Average Penis Too
I'm very sorry guys, I completely forgot about the OCC.
I've contacted a moderator to update the list of members. A few of you didn't include a CPU-Z validation nor had one in your signatures. If you still post one I'll make sure you're added to the list in a timely manner.
Cheers!
AverageNinja
I've contacted a moderator to update the list of members. A few of you didn't include a CPU-Z validation nor had one in your signatures. If you still post one I'll make sure you're added to the list in a timely manner.
Cheers!
AverageNinja
