glocktodahead
New member
name='FragTek' said:
That would be great news!
OC3D Screen Saver Available
- Thread starter Joe
- Start date
That would be great news!
The Annoyance Edition is up --- Rotating psuedo 3d ...
I used completely different programs than the first few so i dont know how it will react to vista/diff resolutions (but it should work on any resolution from my testing) etc.
It Should Keep (shd that be kemp?) you all happy ne additions to be made just post and ill consider them.
Now i have procrastinated enuff and i have to get back to my mountain of uni work ( *is seriously thinking of telling the other group members to fuk a turd, the lazy morons*)
Enjoy
(N.B. this is version 0.9 there is one addition i wish to make and is almost completed but i really need to get on with this work
-- 2142 ne1 ?)
I used completely different programs than the first few so i dont know how it will react to vista/diff resolutions (but it should work on any resolution from my testing) etc.
It Should Keep (shd that be kemp?) you all happy ne additions to be made just post and ill consider them.
Now i have procrastinated enuff and i have to get back to my mountain of uni work ( *is seriously thinking of telling the other group members to fuk a turd, the lazy morons*)
Enjoy
(N.B. this is version 0.9 there is one addition i wish to make and is almost completed but i really need to get on with this work
-- 2142 ne1 ?)OK the Upload for the Rotating editon craps out when u try to Dl it .. is there a file size limit on the upload server ???
edit: i tried to Upload again it failed (actually the UP is complete but the DL gets a 0Byte zip ..) shall i do this as a multipart or simply get access for a big upload (if possible) or host elsewhere (i believe we shd host it IMHO)
edit: i tried to Upload again it failed (actually the UP is complete but the DL gets a 0Byte zip ..) shall i do this as a multipart or simply get access for a big upload (if possible) or host elsewhere (i believe we shd host it IMHO)
OK Its Up and it works I cut the frame Quality to get the file to an acceptable size for the upload script (7.2 MB)
NB this is STILL v0.9
It has also come to my attention (TOX) that a lot of people have 19" wide-screens which usually have a resolution of 1440*900 so ill put 1440*900 versions of the original up too
NB this is STILL v0.9
It has also come to my attention (TOX) that a lot of people have 19" wide-screens which usually have a resolution of 1440*900 so ill put 1440*900 versions of the original up too
Rastalovich
New member
Excellent Joe, more than happy with the screenie situation here 
Just wondering if u could use screen maxsize tags or something to prevent the multiple version situation O o
Just wondering if u could use screen maxsize tags or something to prevent the multiple version situation O o
name='Rastalovich' said:Excellent Joe, more than happy with the screenie situation here
Just wondering if u could use screen maxsize tags or something to prevent the multiple version situation O o
afraid i cannot the director projectors themselves can run with ne res screen but the middleman prog that calls them as screensavers breaks that .. for most people the 2000*1300(the unannotated 1) 1 shd work fine but some peeps dont like to see only the corner of the logo instead of the full thing which happens on ocasion .. personally im running the new spinngfing which thankfully wasnt broken by the conv program i used for it (no i cant use that prog with the others)
Rastalovich
New member
haha - ya the spinning one is ace imo.
If u catch u`rself staring at it, it appears to stretch out - but it doesnt - but does - lol strange.
What a collection uve built up here
If u catch u`rself staring at it, it appears to stretch out - but it doesnt - but does - lol strange.
What a collection uve built up here
FarFarAway
New member
name='Joe' said:
Aye dark humour ftw. Not seen that may check it out
name='FragTek' said:
sweet Frags. That's damn awesome man
Rastalovich
New member
name='Joe' said:its called 29.97 fps being drawn on a display being refreshed (HZ) @ a rate that is not a multiple of 29.97 .
i do love the spinning 1 .. ya shd see the version i have(ya will soon when i can b bothered/hav the time to publish it up here)
Err, it`s also to do with pcs shoving out screen gfxs b4 w8ing for raster lines to complete a full screen. If the coding is done on a none screen area of the timing cycle, u never see any lines chopping up u`r anim.
Depending on the animator to sync up their animation on a basis of framrates is stoopid. They should adopt the old fashioned way of w8ing for vertical blanking to occur - but they can`t, as they`re not multitasking processor based machines, u either get all the information thrown at u or u get nothing, u can`t w8 for a moment in time.
U can cover it up in games by botching it with "vertical syncing" - but that slows things down quite a bit, especially when a routine within something like a game takes longer than a screen cycle to complete, thats when games screen updates slow down.
Old school gaming programming ftw tbh.
name='Rastalovich' said:
yhea but its a flash >> SCR Handler with the frame rate set to 29.97 (aka i have no way around it. i have one running @ 60 fps and when my screen is @ 60 Hz its pure love gravy
(and @ 40 MB it would need to be --- i rele shd just knock the quality of each frame down)please dont mention games programming or security systems (esp networked ones) around me .... drives me into a state of depression and reminds me i have only got 70 % of each project done for uni and the other group members cant really program **IS AWAY TO GET ICE CREAM AND POSSIBLY WHISKY--SIGH**
Rastalovich
New member
I h8 the way uni projects work like that. They`re meant to promote working within a group and hence pin 2 to 4 peoples together to work.
Well, nice tho it sounds, most of the IT `group` work I`ve seen consists of 1 moaner, 1 thinker, 1 lazy arse, and 1 do-er.
hehe what a gross generalization.
Thing is tho, in uni, the group tends to get the results - so it matters little if 1 person does all the slog.
(am I allowed to mention how many women float thro uni doing this !! without getting mugged by the femenist-programmers-support-group? if they`re cute it`s an advantage, like with most walks of life)
I`d eff it tbh and do the thing on meh own and come clean with the lecturer in the end. Eff the group if they aint worth it.
Well, nice tho it sounds, most of the IT `group` work I`ve seen consists of 1 moaner, 1 thinker, 1 lazy arse, and 1 do-er.
hehe what a gross generalization.
Thing is tho, in uni, the group tends to get the results - so it matters little if 1 person does all the slog.
(am I allowed to mention how many women float thro uni doing this !! without getting mugged by the femenist-programmers-support-group? if they`re cute it`s an advantage, like with most walks of life)
I`d eff it tbh and do the thing on meh own and come clean with the lecturer in the end. Eff the group if they aint worth it.
name='Rastalovich' said:
well im in 2 group projects both of 6 pepl and the only one doing NE of it ... ill take the thinker and beatch/do-er please carol
bleh if it affects my marks too much ill try and ask my head of school can i repeat, which may be hard to do considering my pretty good marks in the first semester (the guys i live with repeated so ill be in with a ''good group'' next year for all 3 Group projects -- i had 1 first semester too)
yea women in my couse all .5 of the one we got (they are have manuitus) do float thru ,but there was a VvV HOT one im my physics module last year reasonably smart too
