MSIs latest P55 motherboard comes with the hottest piece of hardware in recent times. Believe the hype?
Continue Reading
Continue Reading
[OC3D Review] MSI P55a Fuzion
- Thread starter tinytomlogan
- Start date
They have put loads of work into making it work. There has been lots of driver fixes so if the support continues the future does look bright.
silenthill
New member
Great review and appreciation to all those who prepared it, at last the green and the red are working together side by side I bet the Nvidia & ATI fans are furious for how can Cain and Abel be on the same ship together pulling the sails side by side so that the ship can go forward ....sorry I mean FPS unbelievable how technology can evolve and bring two rivals to be partners sitting side by side forgetting all their differences and years of bitter competition united in their glory each GPU helping the other to push those frames higher and higher forgetting their colors and who they actually serve can you imagine England and Wales playing as one team together that’s how big this event is and maybe one day these two companies will unite under one name and that is the consumer off course for he is the god of all and they all bow to his demands.
alienware
Banned
Man that's a lot of money for a dual PCIE board. Mind you, you do get what you pay for.
I shall have to read it more thoroughly later and see exactly what's going on, but from a skim over the surface isn't it just a driver than does what the Physx mod does?
The only real criticism I can find is that at a glance it looks like a cheap Gigabyte. I really wish companies would spend more time on the design and aesthetics of these boards. Currently the only company I can really see pushing for visual perfection is Asus. The Crosshair IV is almost a form of art, with looks to die for.
DFI make some good looking boards. Sadly that is where it ends. With most people using a side window these days that MSI board is pretty bland.
Yes, I know, performance before beauty and this board seems great for that, but looks are becoming more important.
I shall have to read it more thoroughly later and see exactly what's going on, but from a skim over the surface isn't it just a driver than does what the Physx mod does?
The only real criticism I can find is that at a glance it looks like a cheap Gigabyte. I really wish companies would spend more time on the design and aesthetics of these boards. Currently the only company I can really see pushing for visual perfection is Asus. The Crosshair IV is almost a form of art, with looks to die for.
DFI make some good looking boards. Sadly that is where it ends. With most people using a side window these days that MSI board is pretty bland.
Yes, I know, performance before beauty and this board seems great for that, but looks are becoming more important.
silenthill
New member
At a glance it looks like a cheap Gigabyte. Hay mate be careful how you choose your words because I don’t feel like buying another M/B after spending 150£ on one this year money doesn’t grow on trees you know how would you like it if I said like a cheap Asrock AliveXfire . Man you’re talking about my wife here my honour my pride just try and say company X or Z that will be more appropriate and wouldn’t hurt people’s feelings.
VonBlade
New member
Not in the least. Holy hell. Couldn't be more wrong
As someone who deals with a lot of "cheap" boards, no this doesn't look cheap. Not quite sure which pictures you're seeing there, but you might want to dig out a "Cheap Gigabyte" and compare. Of course looks are subjective, but it most certainly doesn't look cheap.
VB
PS - anyone who can stand up and say the DFI Lanparty X58 is good-looking needs to go to Specsavers. Although the DFI P55 DK is beyond gorgeous.
alienware
Banned
I owned a LP dark. Was based on the 790FX IIRC, something like that. Gorgeous looking board. All the slots were a lovely lumo yellow that reacted ace with a black light and the coolers were all very nice and large
Not seen their X58 but in all honesty I wouldn't look any farther than Asus for that..
I think the board here looks cheap because (and most importantly) the NB/SB coolers look a bit pathetic if I'm being honest, especially on a board of that price. Everything just looks a bit sparse.. Mind you, after seeing that animal of a Gigabyte thing recently I would think that
I just took another look and I stand behind my criticism. The 8 pin AUX is in the worst place they could have put it. My Asrock (which was £30 lmao) has a molex there for the PCIE lanes and it's a royal PITA.
Not seen their X58 but in all honesty I wouldn't look any farther than Asus for that..
I think the board here looks cheap because (and most importantly) the NB/SB coolers look a bit pathetic if I'm being honest, especially on a board of that price. Everything just looks a bit sparse.. Mind you, after seeing that animal of a Gigabyte thing recently I would think that
I just took another look and I stand behind my criticism. The 8 pin AUX is in the worst place they could have put it. My Asrock (which was £30 lmao) has a molex there for the PCIE lanes and it's a royal PITA.
delusion77
New member
I dont suppose you could show us 2x 5870 cfx vs fusion and 2x gtx480 sli vs fusion in game performance? I think this new tech is pretty cool as it gives a lot more freedom when upgrading.
On the topic of looks, it looks fine - but the best looking boards are the newer Asus boards (mainly the ROG ones)
On the topic of looks, it looks fine - but the best looking boards are the newer Asus boards (mainly the ROG ones)
VonBlade
New member
If you read the HYDRA results section of the review you'll see that the results are compared to GTX480 SLI. Also if you look at the UD9 review you can see all the GTX480 multi-card results you wish, and the recent Sapphire 5970 TOXIC dealt with 5870XF results.
Feel free to look around the site for other reviews. The main reason we try to keep all test systems identical is to ensure that you can pull data across from other reviews and still find them valid.
Happy to help.
VB
Feel free to look around the site for other reviews. The main reason we try to keep all test systems identical is to ensure that you can pull data across from other reviews and still find them valid.
Happy to help.
VB
alienware
Banned
This would make an insane amount of sense to me. I know VB likes the colour scheme and is very enthusiastic about it but seriously, come on, £250?
When I got my Crosshair a year ago I paid £125. If I was about to pay double that I would want double the function, better cooling on the bridges and so on. The MSI doesn't have much of anything. Sure it performs very very well, but at £250 they'll have a ruddy hard time getting any one to buy it.
Mind you according to Scan the Big Bang board is £262. That's insane man. Actually on closer inspection the Big Bang board has triple PCIE slots, heatpipes accross the upper cooling system (NB & VRMS) and looks much much sexier.
Edit. Actually, looking over this review board again makes me change my opinion of it somewhat. It is nicer than I thought. Tom you need to stop spoiling us with filthy smutty images of £400+ motherboards. It's like making sweet love to gorgeous models and then being chucked back into bed with a regular lass
No 'big' retailers have listed the product yet, but if you click the link you can see where Veebs got the price from. And thats all thats about in the UK atm.
http://www.google.co.uk/products?hl=en&q=msi p55a fuzion&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wf
http://www.google.co.uk/products?hl=en&q=msi p55a fuzion&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wf
silenthill
New member
OK guys time out, one of my mates has asked me to build him a system he has a Radeon HD5850 leftover from his old AMD system which we sold on eBay yesterday and after I showed him this review he likes the motherboard very much because it has a new idea (ATI+NVIDIA) and he wants a GF460 to go with it I have advised him to go with a second HD5850 but he insists on two different cards he really likes the idea even with his knowledge of the limited game support also being ATI card holder for year now he is very eager to see the Physx on his new system so now can anyone tell me where I can buy this board with quick delivery without messing about because all I have seen so far is 175$ there and 210£ here, it sounds like an auction so seriously has anybody got some solid retailer with good backup service and delivery because I usually buy ether from scan or OCUK also CCL recently.
alienware
Banned
If it's only Physx he wants to run alongside his 5850 then that can be done on any board. From what I can tell (though it's not clear to me what this lucid chip is really doing) it does do some magic, but it's perfectly possible to run Physx side by side with a Radeon.
Also... If it's only Physx he wants the 460 for it's a terrible waste of cash. A 240 would do it, 8800GT would do it, 9800GT would do it and so on. Recently on this site I ran a test using a 8800 Ultra alongside a 3870x2 and my Physx score in Fluidmark was identical to that of some one who had a 8800 GTS.
I have a sneaking suspicion that the Physx technology that is integrated onto the cards that can run it (240, 8800 GT and so on) is all the same. I mean, if you think about it logically those PCI Physx cards are apparently every bit as good as the Physx that runs on any Nvidia card. I think that the Physx is on the die of the main GPU but a seperate entity.
Also, when I run my 8800U as a Physx card it *never* gets hotter than idle temps. Which just goes to show to me it's either not working very hard at all or if it is then it's not breaking any sweat at all.
I know that this site does not review things in the interest of geeks and science like I do. Fair play to that, they are a new product reviewer. But I would be terribly interested in seeing the two cards used here alongside eachother in a regular dual PCIE slotted board running GenL's Physx mod.
I'm not trying to stir anything up with that, I just find this sort of stuff terribly interesting and geeky. Tech porn, if you will.
Also... If it's only Physx he wants the 460 for it's a terrible waste of cash. A 240 would do it, 8800GT would do it, 9800GT would do it and so on. Recently on this site I ran a test using a 8800 Ultra alongside a 3870x2 and my Physx score in Fluidmark was identical to that of some one who had a 8800 GTS.
I have a sneaking suspicion that the Physx technology that is integrated onto the cards that can run it (240, 8800 GT and so on) is all the same. I mean, if you think about it logically those PCI Physx cards are apparently every bit as good as the Physx that runs on any Nvidia card. I think that the Physx is on the die of the main GPU but a seperate entity.
Also, when I run my 8800U as a Physx card it *never* gets hotter than idle temps. Which just goes to show to me it's either not working very hard at all or if it is then it's not breaking any sweat at all.
I know that this site does not review things in the interest of geeks and science like I do. Fair play to that, they are a new product reviewer. But I would be terribly interested in seeing the two cards used here alongside eachother in a regular dual PCIE slotted board running GenL's Physx mod.
I'm not trying to stir anything up with that, I just find this sort of stuff terribly interesting and geeky. Tech porn, if you will.
