AlienALX
Well-known member
The problem is that DX12 is not mainstream yet and won't be for ages and Vulkan? well that's a crap shoot really. Obviously Bethesda et al will use it but it's the really important stuff like BF4 and so on that desperately need it.. Have they done it for Bf4 yet? (that's a genuine question not me being sarcastic, I haven't seen anything on it yet and don't own the game).
Nvidia don't really care about gaps in the lower end dude. They never have. All of their low end cards have been totally bum value for money and always have been. 950, slower than the Radeon counterpart for more money. Same with the 1050.
It's almost like Nvidia's lower end cards are just a token for their skint fans tbh. I mean the 1060 yeah? great card but it could have been so so much better and actually beat the 480. Instead it all gets muddled and it's actually not faster and gets served by the 480 in Vulkan. Now you would think Nvidia would want to do something about that? they don't care.
They've made a market selling mid range GPUs to fantatics for silly amounts of cash. I mean the 1080 must be so much cheaper than the 980ti was to produce* yet they stuffed the price up by nearly £250 !
* OK so we all know that the 1080 is mid range small silicon. The Titan X is obviously the big boy. In die size the 1080 is tiny so material costs plummet. You also get more working cards per chunk of silicon and the percentage of working cores is higher because you can dodge the bad areas of the surface.
Pascal was also a Brucey Bonus because they did not even plan on it. They were going to go from Maxwell - Volta. All of a sudden AMD turn into bum gravy and Pascal appears. So they then knock out a mid range GPU with an absolutely bonkers clock and flog it for record breaking prices.
They must be bloody laughing all the way to the bank !
That is why I have not sold up some stuff and bought a 1080. It's a complete bloody fleece. At least the Titan XP is the real deal big lump of silicon. I would buy one of those, even at the dafter than daft price they want for it if I was on 4k still.
Nvidia don't really care about gaps in the lower end dude. They never have. All of their low end cards have been totally bum value for money and always have been. 950, slower than the Radeon counterpart for more money. Same with the 1050.
It's almost like Nvidia's lower end cards are just a token for their skint fans tbh. I mean the 1060 yeah? great card but it could have been so so much better and actually beat the 480. Instead it all gets muddled and it's actually not faster and gets served by the 480 in Vulkan. Now you would think Nvidia would want to do something about that? they don't care.
They've made a market selling mid range GPUs to fantatics for silly amounts of cash. I mean the 1080 must be so much cheaper than the 980ti was to produce* yet they stuffed the price up by nearly £250 !
* OK so we all know that the 1080 is mid range small silicon. The Titan X is obviously the big boy. In die size the 1080 is tiny so material costs plummet. You also get more working cards per chunk of silicon and the percentage of working cores is higher because you can dodge the bad areas of the surface.
Pascal was also a Brucey Bonus because they did not even plan on it. They were going to go from Maxwell - Volta. All of a sudden AMD turn into bum gravy and Pascal appears. So they then knock out a mid range GPU with an absolutely bonkers clock and flog it for record breaking prices.
They must be bloody laughing all the way to the bank !
That is why I have not sold up some stuff and bought a 1080. It's a complete bloody fleece. At least the Titan XP is the real deal big lump of silicon. I would buy one of those, even at the dafter than daft price they want for it if I was on 4k still.