GingerHamster19
New member
Says it all in the title!
Btw I want people reconmending any other board, i'm just stuck between these two! Thanks!

Btw I want people reconmending any other board, i'm just stuck between these two! Thanks!

Just from looking at the pics, i would go with the MSI board. 7 full length pci-e is awesome, granted only 2 are 16x wired but still.
Because you need 7...... So that makes such a difference obviously.
Yes this, sb-e pointless for gaming. ivy bridge i5 or i7 is more then enough for pure gaming.If it's going to be for gaming, why are you going SB-E at all?
The 3570K and a MSI GD65/MPower are the perfect match for when it comes to games. What makes you think you need the extra grunt associated with SB-E?
If it's going to be for gaming, why are you going SB-E at all?
The 3570K and a MSI GD65/MPower are the perfect match for when it comes to games. What makes you think you need the extra grunt associated with SB-E?
The PCIe lanes can make a difference, apparently at high resolutions when run in multicard configs graphics cards are saturating PCIe 3 x8.
Of course there's no point in getting anything more than a 3820 to go with it.
Also the MSI does have water blocks available for it and is in all back making colour theming easier. Though the Asus board doesn't have stupid looking heat sinks that would need replacing it is going to be very red.
Guess I should point to some benchmarks then.
Here's one of dual 680s on a rampage IV extreme doing a run though a section of battlefield 3 being run at PCie2 x16 (Which should be about the same as PCIe 3 x8) and 3 x16.
You can kinda see the difference it makes in the three screen set up
More info.
On a single card or on a single 1920x1080 monitor it makes no difference. But for multi card configs at high resolutions, the kind of situation where you'd be considering the 2011 platform it is there.