SieB New member Mar 29, 2012 #2 No way, the Q8300 is more than capable even by todays standards, I doubt a Q8300 would even bottleneck a 580
No way, the Q8300 is more than capable even by todays standards, I doubt a Q8300 would even bottleneck a 580
Pr3d4t0r New member Apr 1, 2012 #3 Impossible, for gpu to bottleneck a cpu you'd need at least a dual 7970 or possibly a single 680. how can you assume its being bottlenecked?
Impossible, for gpu to bottleneck a cpu you'd need at least a dual 7970 or possibly a single 680. how can you assume its being bottlenecked?
M MaXiMiZe New member Apr 2, 2012 #5 Well I have a q8200 so it's good to see the response. According to an article I seen somewhere the q8300 is as good as a G8xx series sandy bridge CPU which are not far behind the 2600k's of this world.
Well I have a q8200 so it's good to see the response. According to an article I seen somewhere the q8300 is as good as a G8xx series sandy bridge CPU which are not far behind the 2600k's of this world.
Rastalovich New member Apr 3, 2012 #6 http://forum.overclock3d.net/index.php?/topic/42447-vram-useage-tests/page__view__findpost__p__500890 Here's one of our own guys playing Crysis 2 on a Pentium D with a 560ti. This would be an extreme example for me. Pentium D tho..
http://forum.overclock3d.net/index.php?/topic/42447-vram-useage-tests/page__view__findpost__p__500890 Here's one of our own guys playing Crysis 2 on a Pentium D with a 560ti. This would be an extreme example for me. Pentium D tho..