name='Rastalovich' said:I wouldn`t put it passed some1 to build a pc with an average mobo & cpu, sticking 2 graphic cards in the pcie slots, and installing a linux flavor that will use gpu0 for the cpu and gpu1 for the graphics - merely using the regular cpu to boot.
... any old crappy p4/amd whatever.
Spank an i7. Show us all really how poor a service Intel have given to computing over the last 20 years, and making others hold onto the old tech.
name='Luigi' said:GPU's can only do specialised apps, so that wouldnt work afaik![]()
name='Luigi' said:GPU's can only do specialised apps, so that wouldnt work afaik![]()
name='zak4994' said:I can see in 10 years that Intel and nVidia fighting while AMD sits in the side line.
name='Diablo' said:Only trying to win court fees...in a credit crunch this is a bit immature.
"Sure we can make up, if you admit you were wrong and it was all your fault?"
name='Diablo' said:Yeah, a reread clarifies that a bit. Still means that either intel lose and nothing happens, or intel win and Nvidia pay more. I don't see nvidia making their on processors (yet) but this seems to be pretty anti competitionist by intel, so I wonder if we won't see a counter suit by Nvidia (depending on the outcome of this case) saying that the chipset licensing is anti competition...
Can't be good in the long run tho![]()