GTX 1080 3DMARK Performance leaked

[WYP]

The 3DMARK performance of Nvidia's GTX 1080 has been leaked, showcasing some impressive performance gains.



Read more on the leaked performance of Nvidia's GTX 1080.

 

[Dicehunter]

Be interesting to see *IF these are real* if that 1080 score was at stock or overclocked as I managed to get a graphics score of 26,402 on 3DMark 11 and 21,525 on Firestrike with my overclocked 980 Ti.

 

[Kushiro]

So Titan X just got a lot cheaper eh. Lucky I only kept the few I cherry picked.

 

[Legacy-ZA]

So Titan X just got a lot cheaper eh. Lucky I only kept the few I cherry picked.

It's still a rip off. :mellow:

 

[Ralm]

Since people at OC3D are unable to provide a fair and responsible journalism, here is the source: http://videocardz.com/59882/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-overclocking-performance

EDIT: After all there is a source link on the articles on top, a bit hidden but still it exists. Ive been complaining on Facebook multiple times and no one ever replied telling me that. Im sorry for the misunderstanding.

 

[Dicehunter]

Since people at OC3D are unable to provide a fair and responsible journalism, here is the source: http://videocardz.com/59882/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-overclocking-performance

Fair and responsible ?

Before insulting our news team further could you please clarify ?

WYP reported on the information given, Even in the pictures WYP provided you can clearly see they came from videocardz.com.

 

[Ralm]

Fair and responsible ?

Before insulting our news team could you please clarify ? WYP reported on the information given.

I did many times, I commented many times on facebook asking to put the source of the info on the articles but they just ignore it.

Without a source to validate your "news", its has little to no value. And this has been happening in all articles in the last few months at least.

Its like doing a book on something, if you didnt do it yourself, you need to tell where you get that information to validate what you are saying.

 

[Dicehunter]

I did many times, I commented many times on facebook asking to put the source of the info on the articles but they just ignore it.

Without a source to validate your "news", its has little to no value. And this has been happening in all articles in the last few months at least.

Its like doing a book on something, if you didnt do it yourself, you need to tell where you get that information to validate what you are saying.

The pictures make it pretty obvious that they came from videocardz.com, This is just making a fuss over nothing.

 

[Ralm]

The pictures make it pretty obvious that they came from videocardz.com, This is just making a fuss over nothing.

If they went to the point of modifying the picture, that would be the cherry on top of the cake.

Regardless, I can create a picture saying its from Nvidia or AMD or whatever, but that doesn't make it valid.

Go check other news articles and you will understand what I mean.

 

[Dicehunter]

If they went to the point of modifying the picture, that would be the cherry on top of the cake.

Regardless, I can create a picture saying its from Nvidia or AMD or whatever, but that doesn't make it valid.

Go check other news articles and you will understand what I mean.

You're making a fuss over absolutely nothing bud, As I said you can clearly see that the pictures are from videocardz.com as it plainly states it on the pictures and unless you are clinically blind you can't miss it.

 

[Wraith]

Firstly keep it civil please, Dicehunter is correct it is pretty obvious from image watermarks that the source is Videocards, also the information at the top of the article states "Source: Videocards".

 

[Dicehunter]

Firstly keep it civil please, Dicehunter is correct it is pretty obvious from image watermarks that the source is Videocards, also the information at the top of the article states "Source: Videocards".

Exactly

 

[xnax2802]

Exactly

lol #rekt

 

[Ralm]

Firstly keep it civil please, Dicehunter is correct it is pretty obvious from image watermarks that the source is Videocards, also the information at the top of the article states "Source: Videocards".

The image watermark applies on this article only, my complaint wasn't about this article alone, was about all of them.
Still, I have to be honest I've never seen that button, kinda hidden and after all this time of me complaining everywhere no one had ever told me.

This is a serious thing but after all there is a source so I can double check. Thank you for point me that out and Im sorry for the misunderstanding.

 

[NeverBackDown]

Since people at OC3D are unable to provide a fair and responsible journalism, here is the source: http://videocardz.com/59882/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-overclocking-performance

EDIT: After all there is a source link on the articles on top, a bit hidden but still it exists. Ive been complaining on Facebook multiple times and no one ever replied telling me that. Im sorry for the misunderstanding.

It's a freaking rumor. Who cares if it's valid or not! We already know it's faster. Who cares what the score is... It'll still be different at review time.
C'mon guys.. It's just a rumor. Nothing to fuss about-_-

 

[Kushiro]

Well itd better be faster Otherwise even nVidia fanbois wouldnt be able to defend them.