Fresh leaks on the R9 295X2 (Now Pictured)

NVIDIA has probably anticipated this that's why they didn't reveal their GTX 790 yet.

It does not take much working out what the 790 will be

Two full fat GK110 chips
3gb of VRAM per GPU
Same cooler as the Titan Z
Same PCB as the Titan Z
Clocks to be confirmed.:D
 
Doesn't really matter what its flaws are when compared to a TitanZ... the price difference alone is what makes this card.

Who was comparing it to the Titan Z, if anything that card is an even bigger joke with 2 GK110 chips totally air cooled, again only 2 x 8 pin connectors and then there is the price.

I happen to think that both of these cards are badly thought out.

Both AMD and NVidia should have both bit the bullet and went for a full cover waterblock, 3 x 8 pin power connectors and a decent overclock.

If you are going to build a uber card, make it a beast.
 
Doesn't really matter what its flaws are when compared to a TitanZ... the price difference alone is what makes this card.

Taking the 290x vs Titan comparison to the next level huh. It's very likely that a 790 will release and then the price difference will be far smaller.
 
I am still confused by the fact that you see the solder points for the 8 pin through the backplate.Why?

How the hell is this going to run with just 2 8 pins?

2x8 pin= 300
1x slot= 75

So 375 for a dual card,seeing as the single uses the same setup?anyone else think this is odd?

Which slot is 75w? I was under the impression the PCI-E was only 25w max.
 
Last edited:
Taking the 290x vs Titan comparison to the next level huh. It's very likely that a 790 will release and then the price difference will be far smaller.

NVidia could easily do it for £800 or putting it another way the same price as the GTX 690 was sold for using the specs I listed above.

Two full fat GK110 chips
3gb of VRAM per GPU
Same cooler as the Titan Z
Same PCB as the Titan Z
Clocks to be confirmed.

What slot is 75w? I was under the impression the PCI-E was only 25w max.

The slot is 75 watts and I suspect with a mobo like the RIVE BE which has an extra power connector for the PCI-E slots that you could get even more.
 
Last edited:
I think it looks really cheap tbh - especially the red fan.

I don't really understand why they've opted for a radiator to cool it though. The normal 290 ran incredibly hot as we all know, but I struggle to believe that can be solved by a thin 120mm radiator to cool 2 of them.

Its quite a thick rad though, similar to the H80i. In push pull I bet its got enough cooling to keep this at AMDs acceptable levels.

As my self and others have found out with the Kraken G10, its surprising how well a cheap AIO can cool the GPU better than even the good air cooled cards - They are so limited in heatsink space in air cooling on graphics cards compared to CPUS. As long as you properly cool the vram and VRMs also.

With equal cooling it certainly seems like high end GPUs dont run as hot as high end CPUs.
 
Some nude pr0n pics, dat ass :eek2:


xwoXCvF.jpg

c4V0z2C.jpg

HtLByyn.jpg

 
According to one of the pics I posted on page 3 the rad is 35mm thick if the info is correct. :)
 
No crossfire finger? I wonder if this will finally be the iteration where AMD eliminates the need for the bridge and just communicate via bus?
 
No crossfire finger? I wonder if this will finally be the iteration where AMD eliminates the need for the bridge and just communicate via bus?

The 290x doesn't have a crossfire finger either iirc.
Then again putting this thing in crossfire is probably going to get quite weird because of the radiators.
 
Looks like the rad from my seidon 120m (same OEM). If a seidon 120m can keep a 9590 happy then it'll have no issues here.

-edit- yay AMD's PR. >:C
 
Back
Top