name='Bungral' said:News thief!!!!
Grrrrr already started this.
10.1 bit of a waste of time ay.
name='Toxcity' said:Ah, sorry.. didn't see yours as DX is software.![]()
name='Bungral' said:And what is it to do with huh huh huh... Plus other DX stuff has been done in there so ner
Na don't worry about it... Wanna add the bit about DX10.1 to it?
Ah, bout damn time. How many times have we said Software needs to catch up to hardware? Well i say its about damn time its the other way around.we also heard that Multithreaded Rendering
name='PP Mguire' said:I laugh at everybody saying hardware needs to catch up. Becasue i honestly think yall are the same people screaming software needs to catch up when new hardware becomes availible. *thinks back to PCI-E 3.0 thread*
name='mrapoc' said:i can see them skippin dx10 pretty much
name='nepas' said:dx10 has not caught on due to the majority staying with xp,so is dx11 for the next windows OS?if so that means all the people who bought vista (myself included) have been suckered
I was saying that before it even came out. People today still nay say me.Me and Rast got the nail on the head... Windows ME all over again.