N
nick25
Guest
I always thought the main difference between the FX and A64 was the FX's integrated memory controller and the use of dual channel but now with socket 939 enabling dual channel on regurlar A64's is the performance between the two going to be worth the price difference? I know FX are retaining their 1mb L2 cache while the A64 are lowering to 512kb but do you think the FX's will be worth the extra cost over the regular A64's.
One thing I do like about the FX's is they seem to overclock quite nicely (not sure how the A64's do) which remind me, phil with your FX are you just multi overclocking or cranking up the FSBas well? I'm quite a fan of a nice high FSB
One thing I do like about the FX's is they seem to overclock quite nicely (not sure how the A64's do) which remind me, phil with your FX are you just multi overclocking or cranking up the FSBas well? I'm quite a fan of a nice high FSB
