i think you need to go back to school and learn to read. the review said and i'll quote it for you
"According to the ASUS website the Maximus VI has five PCIe 3.0 slots, which obviously isn't the case. Someone needs to proof read."
asus said it had 5 PCIe 3.0, anyone can see there are 5 slots but they are NOT all PCIe 3 as asus website said.
Go find a picture through google image search and count versus the review please.
(4 x PCIe 3.0/2.0 x16 (x16 or dual x8 or x8/x16/x8 or x8/x16/x8/x8)
1 x PCIe 2.0 x4
1 x mini-PCIe 2.0 x1
source: Review)
BTW that black 3.0 slot, that would be, oh thats right for dual gpu use and is native to the cpu just like the top red slot is native. Now look at the slots and count them 4 red full length, 1 full length black, 1 x4 slot, and the mini slot at the top. Count them for me that would be seven in total, yet the review has only 6 listed, smells fishy. What I can't say that is wrong and inaccurate?
Edit: Now, I have given you all the evidence I can, without you actually holding a board in your hand. How about now, you face facts and admit the review is wrong. Based on this, I have every right to say things, and every right to question not only the review but the results that TTL got. Why? Because when you make statements like that, that are so blatently false, it does call into question things. Either he lied, or he is dumb and blind. The attitude, is pretty much the same TTL has for Asus, so don't like it, meh whatever. So in closing, take a look for yourself and do research and don't just read one review and think you have all the facts. Pictures are worth a thousand words, go look at one. I have responded to you with evidence twice now, will you ignore facts and call names or will you admit that maybe TTL was wrong, at the very least?