name='Rastalovich' said:The AMD 6400 x2 is roughly the equiv. pp to what C2D ?
Going by the marketing label they used to adopt, but poo-poo`d some time ago, can u say E6300 ? meh, trying to be a E6300 ?
I think they didn`t internally drop that marketing, but were forced to say they had when performances turned out to be so different.
AMD 3800 x2 roughly equiv. pp to a theoretical Intel E3800 ? When the E6300 was out ?
name='Bungral' said:The 6400 x2 is something comparable to a E6700 both at stock... Around there anyway.
name='XMS' said:Bloody hell, soon they'll be selling X2's in a big jar behind the counter of your local corner shop. "I'll have a quarter of X2 please shopkeeper".. "that'll be 50 pence son".
name='Bungral' said:The 6400 x2 is something comparable to a E6700 both at stock... Around there anyway.
name='Mr. Smith' said:NO WAY! Do you have any benchies or anything? I thought they were well behind...
name='nrage' said:It depends on the task:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/charts/cpu-charts/clone-dvd-2-8,296.html?p=616%2C615%2C613%2C612
They don't have the AMD X2 6400 in there but they do have the 6000 and you can compare that to the E6600 and E6700, different tasks give different results, mostly due to the memory architecture I suspect.