While impressive gains and amazing 'content' scores are had, I feel the gaming scores are quickly overlooked in the conclusion. For us that are not hardcore content creators, just about any CPU does the job expect for gaming. This is really the only place where we benefit from something special.
Looking at the 9900K and the 3900X, we have similar costs but Intel still comes out on top.
For the gaming benchmark, setting 3900x FPS performance at 100%, Intel scores (non-OC values, since Intel OC results are not included) ;
110,2%
106,1%
107,9%
121,3%
For an average of 111,4% or 11,4% more FPS than AMD.
This from a CPU that is 3/4 of a year old.
I assume the difference will be less with higher resolutions, so too bad 1440p is not included.
Again, awesome gains. And power/heat is just a lost battle for Intel - but if you want the best gaming rig - or just most FPS for your $500 then Intel is still the way to go as far as I can see. Speculating that more cores will be handy down the line is still just that, speculation.