AMD Ryzen 1600X Cinebench results leak

[WYP]

Cinebench results for AMD's Ryzen 1600X CPUs have leaked, offering results that are similar to Intel's i7 6850K for an expected retail price of $260.



Have a look at AMD's Ryzen 1600X leaked Cinebench scores.

 

[AlienALX]

I believe.....

 

[Bartacus]

I WANT to believe! I just hope it's true, and not another piece of leaked AMD marketing B.S.

 

[AlienALX]

I WANT to believe! I just hope it's true, and not another piece of leaked AMD marketing B.S.

The Blender result was questionable. Not as in were AMD cheating but more because you can skew the results in Blender.

The CPUZ benchmark was questionable, because it's sketchy as hell and I have never used it as a real bench mark of what a CPU can do.

This though? I don't really think there is any way to cheat Cinebench. I have always used it as my go to "who can urinate the highest" CPU benchmark.

This scores ever so slightly higher than my Ivy 8 core 16 thread. If this is stock speed? I'm totally a believer. Even if it's not no quad core from Intel at the same sort of price can match that score.

 

[Kaapstad]

Looks good to me.

 

[Ando]

This 1600x is looking like it will send shockwaves through the PC community... 6800k performance for i5 pricing is crazy good!

 

[NeverBackDown]

This will probably be the new go to CPU for many gamers.

 

[dadyal]

Many of people who recently bought i7 6700k or 7700k or 6800K are praying that these results are fake and these cpus are just a hype as they can not justify spending $350/$400 on a cpu that does less than a $260 CPU from AMD

 

[AlienALX]

Stock 5820k scores about 1030. I can get past 1200 with mine at max clocks (4.6ghz). So even if this is overclocked then it's still going to be a kickass CPU for the money.

The revelation here though is that you could theoretically put this in a $69 motherboard. Try doing that with X99....

 

[Dark NighT]

Stock 5820k scores about 1030. I can get past 1200 with mine at max clocks (4.6ghz). So even if this is overclocked then it's still going to be a kickass CPU for the money.

The revelation here though is that you could theoretically put this in a $69 motherboard. Try doing that with X99....

For that money you'd end up with just a socket and a empty board still needing all the parts.

 

[shadow]

It's interesting, I hope that it's not all marketing hype.

Lets also hope the price doesn't skyrocket when it gets to this side of the pond.

From what i have seen many people are still using 2500k's and 3570k's, with the right pricing to performance ratio, these people could be tempted toward building a new rig.

 

[Piskeante]

Another big WOW for the community. The other day, i said that the CPU-z bechmark showed a 6/12 CPU running at 3,444mhz with 0,374v, which is IMPOSSIBLE (at least in the pictures shown)

The score in cinebench seems legit, but, this means that this CPU at stock speed (with turbo for 3,7ghz) get's the same result as an I7 7700K overclocked to 5,1ghz. so, a 260$ stock clocks CPU will get the same result as a 350$ CPU overclocked to the limit where only 25% of those can get (and consider also that none of those would do it if they don't delid).

I think that chip will overclock very nice, so we can expect at least 4,5ghz out of it, which would mean around 1250 - 1350 points in cinebench.

My E5 1650 will do 1245 points oced to 4,8ghz, so i think the ratio Performance per dollar of this CPU will absolutely destroy Intel.

Bad times for intel.......

 

[AlienALX]

Cpuz was updated for Ryzen yesterday fella.

 

[Brutos]

My X79 4930K while still very very good i want to support the underdog and go AMD again my first build was AMD and at this point i can see a Easter build coming with Ryzen

 

[AlienALX]

My X79 4930K while still very very good i want to support the underdog and go AMD again my first build was AMD and at this point i can see a Easter build coming with Ryzen

Yeah see you are in the same camp as me. No real point in upgrading because if anything Ryzen is going to start a core war and Intel will finally bring out a hex core "mainstream" CPU. And when they do devs will sit up and listen and your chip will suddenly spring into action.

I have a 5820k rig and a 8/16 Xeon that are both waiting to actually fully work.

The good part is that I no longer have to worry so much if something breaks, because Ryzen would be a reasonable option to replace with.

 

[NeverBackDown]

I'm in the wanting to upgrade camp.. or side grade I guess? From a 6700k. Just don't think it's worth switching right now though.
Think Vega will be more important for me.

 

[AlienALX]

I'm in the wanting to upgrade camp.. or side grade I guess? From a 6700k. Just don't think it's worth switching right now though.
Think Vega will be more important for me.

Put it like this. Would you upgrade your 6700k to a 6800k?

If the answer is yes then go for it. Personally I have not had a four core rig in years. Mainly because (and loads of people never notice it) Microsoft added very good 8+ core support in Windows 8 (loads of people didn't even switch so would not have noticed) and multi tasking (again no one ever talks about this) is just so much better with more cores.

And you will load them and use them during desktop use, too. I have watched mine and the more apps and windows I have open the more the CPU seems to work harder.

Personally I would wait and see for now. It's the 8 core you want. Would you upgrade to a 5960x? I shouldn't even really need to ask that question

See what the entry level 8 core is all about dude.

 

[NeverBackDown]

Put it like this. Would you upgrade your 6700k to a 6800k?

If the answer is yes then go for it. Personally I have not had a four core rig in years. Mainly because (and loads of people never notice it) Microsoft added very good 8+ core support in Windows 8 (loads of people didn't even switch so would not have noticed) and multi tasking (again no one ever talks about this) is just so much better with more cores.

And you will load them and use them during desktop use, too. I have watched mine and the more apps and windows I have open the more the CPU seems to work harder.

Personally I would wait and see for now. It's the 8 core you want. Would you upgrade to a 5960x? I shouldn't even really need to ask that question

See what the entry level 8 core is all about dude.

I'm going to wait, but more than likely won't switch unless I can find some amazing deals down the line.

 

[AngryGoldfish]

I think the upgrade would be more suited to i7 950/2600K/3770K and i5 2500K/3570K/4670K users. Anything after Haswell might not be worth it. Maybe a 6600K would be worth upgrading from if when you were building a new PC didn't initially want to pay an extra €100 for hyper-threading but would now would benefit from it. You wouldn't have to purchase new memory so it wouldn't be that big of an expenditure for such a huge performance upgrade.

 

[Dark NighT]

I think the upgrade would be more suited to i7 950/2600K/3770K and i5 2500K/3570K/4670K users. Anything after Haswell might not be worth it. Maybe a 6600K would be worth upgrading from if when you were building a new PC didn't initially want to pay an extra €100 for hyper-threading but would now would benefit from it. You wouldn't have to purchase new memory so it wouldn't be that big of an expenditure for such a huge performance upgrade.

Yeah that sounds about right.

I been on this i5 3570k since oct 2012 and i am now frequently hitting 100% cpu usuage with just guild wars2, a few programs and a browser, i really want more headroom, as its starting to become noticeable performance drops, that game and browsers never stop developing, requirements just go up and its high time to get new stuff, the itch is real!