AMD RX580 PowerColor Red Devil Review

What's the likely price? Mid-£200's I'm thinking - the 1060 Strix that it fairly-closely matches is around £290-300 and the 480's are about £230-260 or so, expect it to fill that range I guess.
 
Added this in with my Ryzen system it would of taken the price to around the £650 mark which in fairness is a really nice price range for a proper gaming system, though that red needs to be white

What's the likely price? Mid-£200's I'm thinking - the 1060 Strix that it fairly-closely matches is around £290-300 and the 480's are about £230-260 or so, expect it to fill that range I guess.

Probably why I kept seeing Asus post with specials for 480's on FB
 
Nice review, I have a mates customer who was told to hold off and not get an RX480 by me and just as well as the RX580 is going to be much better for him and he will be gaming at 1080 so this will give him all the bells and whistles :)
 
Genuinely glad that AMD have allowed the AIBs to put their coolers on the cards from the start and not forcing them to use reference designs initially. They should do the same for Vega as well
 
Nice card. Seems like they've refined the last one so fair play. I think they've learned a bit from Sapphire.

Thanks for the review Tom :)
 
Looks like there are models with stock clocks of up to 1450MHz, shame nobody goes higher than 8000MHz on the memory,
 
This all makes me wonder how Vega will clock, it will be on the same enhanced process. One of the problems with the Fury X was that it didn't clock much higher than 1000MHz, and even at that it can still compete with the GTX 1070 in a lot of games.
 
AMD needed to push Fury X. They also had to push Polaris *and* Ryzen. Is it fair to assume Vega will follow suit?

I would strongly imagine so.
 
It should theoretically improve with each new architecture though. Maybe after Vega we'll start to see more... finished products from AMD. With that said, Vega has been working for many months now. Is it really considered rushing when everyone has seen working silicon and the market is demanding it yet it is being postponed until it's right?
 
It should theoretically improve with each new architecture though. Maybe after Vega we'll start to see more... finished products from AMD. With that said, Vega has been working for many months now. Is it really considered rushing when everyone has seen working silicon and the market is demanding it yet it is being postponed until it's right?

It should improve but you need to remember this is a fiercely competitive market so IMO the days of 60% overclocks are gone. Ever since the manus introduced all of these boost techs they've used them to make the cards look better.

Now sure, there is far more headroom in Nvidia cards but that's only because they're so far ahead. I'd bet that if AMD could push them they'd wring a GTX's neck to gain the lead.

Manus used to abhor overclocking, now they all depend on it. Very ironic really eh? Even funnier that Intel even started flogging insurance for it :D
 
Now sure, there is far more headroom in Nvidia cards but that's only because they're so far ahead.

I would add that this is also due, in large part, to Nvidia simply sharpening their own known (and slightly old) technology, and not innovating in pretty much ANY way. They've been improving the same stuff in increments, as opposed to releasing anything new or innovative. Why would they, since they own the market?
 
I would add that this is also due, in large part, to Nvidia simply sharpening their own known (and slightly old) technology, and not innovating in pretty much ANY way. They've been improving the same stuff in increments, as opposed to releasing anything new or innovative. Why would they, since they own the market?

Nvidia stopped making Fermi ages ago.....

Think about that sentence in every sense.

AMD need to stop making Fermi now.....
 
Oh I didn't say Nvidia were the ONLY ones who do that stuff. :) AMD is worse for re-branding old crap than anyone; they both do it.
 
Oh I didn't say Nvidia were the ONLY ones who do that stuff. :) AMD is worse for re-branding old crap than anyone; they both do it.

I didn't mean that.

Fermi was a huge big tank. After that they cut back the crap which allowed them to crank the clocks. AMD have been making Fermi GCN hefty cores since the 7970. They've been obsessed with the kitchen sink ever since.

Pascal clocks to over double the MHz of Fury X. And they are tiny.
 
Back
Top