AMD RX Vega pictured

But I personally don't like to pay a lot of money to get a card where I from day one have to turn down graphics to get the best graphics.
I know that in price/performance it doesn't make sense to pay 50% more to get 25% ekstra performance.
And the reason I say it's to late is, that 1080 launched more than a year ago. Buying 1080 performance now is in my sense stupid, as the next card is probably not that far off that hopefully will bring better performance at the same price.
 
But I personally don't like to pay a lot of money to get a card where I from day one have to turn down graphics to get the best graphics.
I know that in price/performance it doesn't make sense to pay 50% more to get 25% ekstra performance.
And the reason I say it's to late is, that 1080 launched more than a year ago. Buying 1080 performance now is in my sense stupid, as the next card is probably not that far off that hopefully will bring better performance at the same price.

I agree. It's senseless, and a huge shame. But is that AMD's fault? I've said this before so I don't want to sound preachy, but we're pointing fingers while as blind as we are in those weird dreams where you can't see where you're going. We know there's something there and we think we know what it is, but ultimately we don't.

We don't know why Vega took so long—stipulate all you like, you do not know. If you do, show me evidence because I haven't seen it. We don't know Vega's final performance with updated clock speeds and drivers. We don't know its price. We don't know its availability. We don't know whether there is going to be a refresh. We don't know when Volta will arrive. We don't know how expensive it will be. We don't know what its performance will be.
 
I said that Vega would launch in September. It makes perfect sense, that is when they released Fury X two years ago. It's something to do with the whole "back to school" thing.

What they categorically should not have done was start teasing it a year ago. That's nuts.
 
But i don't get the fault thing. As i can as a consumer just buy something else. I generally don't get to attached to brand names. The reason i say generally is my G-sync monitor, i have locked myself to nvidia for the next 3-5 years. Unless something major happens.

It's just bad business for AMD as for every day they don't have a good performing competitor to Nvidia, they will lose the big money as the expensive models usually make more money on those. Nvidia dropped the price 100$ on the 1080 when the 1080 ti came. That's 9 month of some part of the 100$ per sold card they have made. AMD has to put out a good price to get people to buy it as the performance isn't better = bad for profit.
 
Last edited:
But i don't get the fault thing. As i can as a consumer just buy something else. I generally don't get to attached to brand names. The reason i say generally is my G-sync monitor, i have locked myself to nvidia for the next 3-5 years. Unless something major happens.

It's just bad business for AMD as for every day they don't have a good performing competitor to Nvidia, they will lose the big money as the expensive models usually make more money on those. Nvidia dropped the price 100$ on the 1080 when the 1080 ti came. That's 9 month of some part of the 100$ per sold card they have made. AMD has to put out a good price to get people to buy it as the performance isn't better = bad for profit.

In the same way we shouldn't favour one brand, we shouldn't disfavour another. I'm tied to AMD with Freesync like you're tied Nvidia with Gsync. The GTX 1080 was always overpriced in my opinion. The 1080Ti is also overpriced, but is also a little OP for my needs. AMD will hopefully fill the niche of being faster than a 1080 at either the same price or cheaper. If Nvidia supported Freesync, I might have already purchased a 1080 as with a 2.1Ghz overclock, I really can't see Vega being any better in anything but AMD-prominent titles like Hitman and Resident Evil—and that's not even guaranteed.


AMD are indeed late to the party, but using that logic so is the 1080Ti.

Buying 1080 performance now is in my sense stupid, as the next card is probably not that far off that hopefully will bring better performance at the same price.

Let me change that for you.

Buying 1080Ti performance now is in my sense stupid, as the next card is probably not that far off that hopefully will bring better performance at the same price.

If Volta is so close at hand and is going to devalue Vega within a few months, it'll also devalue the 1080Ti, a card that has just had its $1000 Kingpin version released.

In my opinion, Nvidia has spoiled an already spoiled nation of gamers and enthusiasts. People have got £750 to spend on graphics cards every 8-12 months so Nvidia will provide it. For better or worse, AMD are aiming at a different market. Of course, if the recent rumoured prices from a Swedish retailer are anything to go by, AMD have completely failed, but if they're false and Vega can come in at $500-550 with 1080-beating performance, that's a GPU for me. And seeing as you've already established you're tied to Nvidia, why claim Vega being released now is stupid when we don't know all the facts? Not to suggest you can't express an opinion, but that's all it is: an opinion.
 
I remember there being plenty available by August. I bought my aftermarket Fury early September, and I had deliberately waited for other users to start receiving theirs before purchasing.

I remember OCUK and Scan having about 10 each. All were XFX. Then other brands trickled in very very slowly after that. The Strix Fury took forever to come into stock.

Mine was purchased on launch day from Scan. I paid £430 for it about a week later, which would have been in September or maybe late August.
 
I remember OCUK and Scan having about 10 each. All were XFX. Then other brands trickled in very very slowly after that. The Strix Fury took forever to come into stock.

Mine was purchased on launch day from Scan. I paid £430 for it about a week later, which would have been in September or maybe late August.

It doesn't matter, really. My experience is different and I bought a Fury Strix from OCUK on 9/9/15 and it had been for sale for almost a month by then, but it really doesn't matter. It's been roughly two years since Fury X initially came out, give or take a couple of months. What matters is whether that was too long, and according to 99% of people we speak to indirectly or directly, it was. Vega should have come out in April as a quick rebuttal to the 1080Ti. But for whatever reason it's now almost August and we still don't know its price, availability, or its final gaming performance.
 
Back
Top