Well thats the thing. What we have seen so far, it's not an absolute monster at all. You're just assisting with the hype. It's going to be a good performer yes. That's where it ends though, as there has been nothing to really back anything up.
The same goes for Nvidia when they release cards. Both parties use Biased benchmarks and charts. I'm impressed with the card, but I am not sold yet, especially using Stars Wars to showcase 4k @ 60fps or more.
What really backs it up is once the NDA is lifted and reviewers like OC3D, Guru3D etc can go balls to the wall on overclocking, run their own unbiased tests, and hopefully provide a well written and once again, "unbiased" opinion on the card.
Ye i should qualify what i mean when i say its a beast, im not so much pointing at pure game performance, thats not discounting that over 60fps in 4k on ultra is nothing to sniffle at, but its that from how they explained how the things actually work means that yes its a gaming orientated gpu but the way it uses memory is something new for us.
As i understand it that yes its been done before, it was bulky in the way it allowed you to use addition on system memory for vram. How good this system will be is something we will have to wait and see.
So thats where im coming from when i said its kind of a beast and how manufacturers can go nutz with the things, not that its gonna be cheap or that its going to destroy 1080ti.