Knew you would come along and say something like this lol
Did you even read the article or look at the source? Or even know what the reasoning behind it is? It's not a literal uprising. It's metaphoric in the sense that the big underdog is coming up and rising.. aka in market share. Doing this through multiple ways, from the source:
1: Prestige. “They wanted the prestige of a $700 graphics card, but they didn’t want to have to pay for it,” Hook begins.
2: VR that just works. “They wanted the ability to have a great VR experience today or two years from now without worrying about upgrading power supplies and digging into their PC. They wanted to buy a headset at some point and just have it work.”
3: Respect their investment. “They wanted us to pay respect to the dollars they were giving us and do things in the architecture or transistors or APIs or ASync Compute, that provided a measure of ‘futureproofness.’ They wanted to be reassured that even if they’re only spending $200 they’d feel secure in their investment for a couple years.”
4: More overclocking control. “We brainstormed what kind of voltage control could be given to them to create a better experience.
5: Better drivers. “We feel we’ve made a great first step there, and we’re only going to be putting a heavier foot on the gas this year and next year to make those drivers better and better.”
So that whole social justice thing?? Not even relevant. Even looking at the ad directly and ignoring everything else, you can tell the posts they have(from left to right) means
1: More Streaming. Because everything is more accessible.
2: Lower cost of entry to VR. More VR instead of the 1% who are buying now.
3: Make GPUs more quiet.
4: Buy our product!
Put it together and it basically falls under the 5 previous things I mentioned earlier from Koduri. So yes there roadmap looks childish, but looking at it directly you see a dedicated company following there roadmap they believe will work. And with a pretty potent $200 GPU, that's a great start.
AMD for the meantime are letting Nvidia holding the GPU crown for performance. Instead, they are altering there market strategy. For the better too. 80% of GPU buyers are within the $100-300 range. Hence the 970's success. Bringing the cost down to $200 and better performance than a 970 at lower power consumption should really entice people to buy AMD and possibly another down the road. It's a wiser business move and hopefully it works out. I'd like to see AMD get more market share, means more revenue and better future products. Even if that means letting Nvidia win the crown for now.
WYP: Thank you for the article. Would not have seen it otherwise since it was exclusive. Keep up the good work