venice 512kb cache ran superpi 32m 34seconds FASTER than a sandiego with 1mb cache.
everything was the same with both cpu's.
graphics memory timings fsb multiplier everything.
that means 1mb cache either slow things down or the san diego chip tested is faulty but still it ran all benchmarks without problem.
pcmark04 differed less than 15 points between the cpu's
venice beat the SD with 500points in 3dmark01
memory bandwidth, cpu arithmetic and cpu multimedia benchmark scored basicly the same on both cpu's.
program used was sandra.