AMD 8000 & Nvidia 700 Series

Q4 I hear for AMD.

700 series from what I hear ATM isn't a series it's one card - Titan 780. And it derives from failed Tesla K20X so will be in short numbers.

Other than that card Nvidia will not retire Kepler any time soon due to needing to make back what they spent on it. It'll simply go 6 series into a £800 or so 780.
 
I'm not sure if this is bad news or not tbh.

If they'd have been pushed for an early release, the cards would just be renamed 7XXX series. At least this way, they may have time to make more upgrades for the next generation cards, making the wait worthwhile. I'd prefer to wait a year for better cards, than be given the same cards again in 4 months under a different name, just to have to wait over a year again for the actual next generation cards.

For the majority of people gaming at 1920x1080, FPS can be near enough maxed off a single 7870 with an overclock on most games.
I don't really see the need for the companies to rush themselves to release cards.
 
If they delay the new/improved generation of gpu for another year just to meet demand on the consoles, then consoles could be said to be holding pc's back ?
 
Last edited:
Consoles are only holding back AMD, but AMD is currently going through business reorganization, Nvidia is not going to be in any consoles(from rumors). Nvidia might just be delaying and improving Kepler because they know AMD won't be releasing anytime soon
 
well to be honest, they really don't have anything to push for at the moment.
crysis3 beta seems to be getting attention and passing with current tech. but
hopefully with add-ons and texture packages it might make the hardware developers
jump back onto the blackboard and make the game (and appz, too) developers
volly back.
 
Some sites have speculated a $899 (around £569) for it which is nuts, but graphics cards prices always seem to be on the up now :(

I would love to get a titan too as the 5850 I have now doesn't cut the mustard like it used too.
 
AMD delay 8xxx series because Titan Performance... Aaaa red devil was just ready to sell one more litte revision for 520e. But Titan destroyed their plans. Now they go to project new chip and that will not soon.
 
I don't think the titan is massively important. It's not even being labelled as part of any particular series so we won't see any lower performing or priced cards come from it for ages, if ever and most people just won't need it let alone afford it.
 
My 6850 is staring to show it's age too...
Will upgrade CPU somewhere around Summer, and then towards the end of the year I'll be looking at the next 88xx cards (Whichever's priced closer to £200) to run BF4 :)
Anyone heard any speculation of the BF4 release date/other info..?
 
So much rumour and speculation out there at the moment regarding what's coming next!

From what I've read on the ever reliable internet recently, it's suggested that AMD are delaying their "8000" series until next year potentially. To be fair though, the current 7000 series are excellent cards giving good value for money. Additionally, with recent driver updates a 7970 is often seen beating a 680 - something it didn't do at launch. possibly NV will respond with their own huge performance boosting drivers, however, from what I've seen so far, the 310.* series and on appear to be improving image quality (sharpness) while not offering a huge boost. Possibly this will change.

The Titan...speculation suggests that this might be a one-off card. It potentially offers some massive performance, however it's not a "flagship" card as that suggests the top model in a range, there is no Titan "range" as far as I can tell, it's just a one-off in the consumer market - I am of course aware of it's K20 roots.

If Titan offers, as some speculate, 690 performance in gaming but stronger Compute AND it come in at a similar price point to a 690 then it might be an attractive card to the enthusiast. As a water cooler, I always factor in the cost of blocks and as such a single 690 is fairly good value solution vs. 2x 680's due to the cost of blocks. The Titan might slip into this category too.

Make no mistake, based on what information we have the Titan could be considered more of a marketing "look what we can do" exercise than anything expected to make money. But, really, isn't any "x2" type like that - even though the Titan is supposedly a single GPU.

I am eager to see some real information on the Titan, and I really hope it's the beast that much of the speculation suggests it is. Not because I'd buy one, but purely because I love this shit if you'll excuse the language.

What if Titan did offer near 690 performance and came it at around £600? What if water blocks were available? That would make a nice single card solution potentially. As of yet we really don't know what the 700 series will bring, we all hope for "full fat" Kepler, but I suspect that we'll actually just get current Keplar refined, with Titan being the only "full fat" option. NV after all need to make money doing this.

Oh, I was firmly in the camp that the "680" was really the "660" when the 600's came out, they were just so small (die size, few transistors) and so frugal on their power needs that I could not comprehend them ever having been intended as true high-end. It was a total turn around too - NV were usually the one with the power-hungry, hot large GPU's. They also excelled at compute vs. AMD's "pure gaming" cards. With the 600 series things were reversed, now AMD has the (comparitively) power-hungry GPU's, they improved their Compute performance whereas NV are now focused on gaming.

Anyway, I'm rambling again...

Scoob.
 
Back
Top