Scoob
New member
Hi,
I live a long way from the exchange, really, right near the limit by all accounts. However, I've always gotten what I considered reasonably good speeds, usually just over 4mbps, giving me around 400 or so kBps download speeds. I was happy with that, living right out int he sticks as I do.
My ADSL Router, and older Netgear DG834G v3, reports my Line Attenuation as ~51db and my Noise Margin of around 6 - 9db for this connection speed.
Some time ago I was having NIGHTMARE broadband issues, my Attenuation went as high as 60+db while my Noise Margin went up to 15+db. I'd get a 300kbps connection at best, that'd last 5 minutes if I was lucky.
Now the various faults have been address, numerous places were rewired outside the property and they fitted an RF filter and an updated ADSL 2.0 master socket (I had the original ADSL 1.0 socket before), my Attenuation is back to 51db and my Noise Margin is usally between 4 and 6db.
Since this was done I get the best connection speeds I've ever had, usually at least 4500kbps and as high as 4800kbps, this gives me between 470 and 505kBps download speeds. Very nice.
However, I've been told that a LOWER Noise Margin value is BAD and it should be higher - totally contrary to what successive BT Engineers told me. Indeed, at one point during the faults being resolved, I was back at my normal 51db line Attenuation, but my Noise Margin was still in the teens and my connection was crap. Only when the numbers fell back to 6db and below on the Noise Margin and stay there did my speed improve.
So, can anyone explain things to me please? I'm guessing it's just my old router reporting things slightly differently to some of the modern, more advanced stuff.
Basically, for a given Line Attenuation - which is usually 51db for me - I always see better connection and speeds with a LOWER reported Noise Margin. As my line improved during the fault resolution process I saw my Noice Margin slowly drop, which fit in perfectly with what the BT engineers were telling me.
Just a bit of a puzzler for me, the conflicting information and all - I thought I knew a reasonable amount about this stuff, however when various "authorities" on the subject directly contradict each other, and my own results appear contrary to the accepted norm, well, I though I'd ask here
Cheers,
Scoob.
I live a long way from the exchange, really, right near the limit by all accounts. However, I've always gotten what I considered reasonably good speeds, usually just over 4mbps, giving me around 400 or so kBps download speeds. I was happy with that, living right out int he sticks as I do.
My ADSL Router, and older Netgear DG834G v3, reports my Line Attenuation as ~51db and my Noise Margin of around 6 - 9db for this connection speed.
Some time ago I was having NIGHTMARE broadband issues, my Attenuation went as high as 60+db while my Noise Margin went up to 15+db. I'd get a 300kbps connection at best, that'd last 5 minutes if I was lucky.
Now the various faults have been address, numerous places were rewired outside the property and they fitted an RF filter and an updated ADSL 2.0 master socket (I had the original ADSL 1.0 socket before), my Attenuation is back to 51db and my Noise Margin is usally between 4 and 6db.
Since this was done I get the best connection speeds I've ever had, usually at least 4500kbps and as high as 4800kbps, this gives me between 470 and 505kBps download speeds. Very nice.
However, I've been told that a LOWER Noise Margin value is BAD and it should be higher - totally contrary to what successive BT Engineers told me. Indeed, at one point during the faults being resolved, I was back at my normal 51db line Attenuation, but my Noise Margin was still in the teens and my connection was crap. Only when the numbers fell back to 6db and below on the Noise Margin and stay there did my speed improve.
So, can anyone explain things to me please? I'm guessing it's just my old router reporting things slightly differently to some of the modern, more advanced stuff.
Basically, for a given Line Attenuation - which is usually 51db for me - I always see better connection and speeds with a LOWER reported Noise Margin. As my line improved during the fault resolution process I saw my Noice Margin slowly drop, which fit in perfectly with what the BT engineers were telling me.
Just a bit of a puzzler for me, the conflicting information and all - I thought I knew a reasonable amount about this stuff, however when various "authorities" on the subject directly contradict each other, and my own results appear contrary to the accepted norm, well, I though I'd ask here

Cheers,
Scoob.