2500k, is this voltage normal for 4.6GHZ?

That sounds insanely low to me, iirc to get around 4.5GHz I needed something like 1.3v or thereabouts
 
does look a tad off lol with the 2500K and no hyperthreading it is possible to get decent oc's on lower volts. But again that looks low. What do you have it set at in bios??? If its accurate you may have a golden chip
 
Do you have speedstep enabled? That's most likely the voltage when not underload and downclocked by speedstep. Run prime 95 and then check your voltage in CPU-Z.
 
Usually, but I can't think of why it's showing 0.98v other than not reporting the voltage correctly. ~0.95v is idle volts for SB, sometimes the multi will spike as well so it could of spiked and read 4.5 at the time.

Dunno though, just thought i'd mention speedstep as a possible cause.
 
Show prime 95 or OCCT running when you take the screen shot, that just sounds like speedstep kicking in at idle.
 
thanks for the replys, the cpuz i verified and linked was while prime95 was running. I will get a screenshot for you now. and just to say the bios is where i have set the voltage.
 
Last edited:
Are you running an up to date version of CPU-Z? Can you post a screenshot of your BIOS settings as well.
Either you have the best 2500K in the world or the voltage is not being reported correctly :lol:
 
Last edited:
yes i had to update it so i can validate the check. and HW monitor is giving me the same voltage and the bios is the same. oh just realisedthat that screenshot i have just done and (i am still currently running) is at 4.7ghz if nobody noticed :)
 
Something is not right, there is no way a 2500k could do a overclock like that at stock volts. Some of the most highly binned 2500ks need at least 1.25v for 4.5ghz.
 
sorry i just posted the same one again, here is the 18 min test

47ocscreenshot_zps7e6e7560.jpg~original
 
Last edited:
According to your BIOS you CPU is running at 1.36v (shown in the last pic) which makes more sense.
 
Back
Top