x264 HD BENCHMARK - Results Please

[Damien c]

Well ran it at 4.8ghz and at 5.2ghz and didn't need to swap the fans from 5v to 12v either which wasn't to bad.

4.8ghz result's

x264 HD BENCHMARK 4.0 RESULTS

Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark!

Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data

to http://forums.techarp.com/reviews-articles/26363-x264-hd-benchmark-4-0-a.html

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Results for x264.exe r1913

==========================

Pass 1

------

encoded 1442 frames, 191.25 fps, 3911.63 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 188.50 fps, 3911.63 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 188.74 fps, 3911.63 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 187.52 fps, 3911.63 kb/s

Pass 2

------

encoded 1442 frames, 49.60 fps, 3959.61 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 49.76 fps, 3959.86 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 49.77 fps, 3959.26 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 48.63 fps, 3959.61 kb/s

System Details

It didn't do the system information though on any of the runs which is weird, maybe it has something to do with CPUZ not loading up at the end had to start it manually for this result and didn't bother loading it for the next run.

5.2ghz result's

x264 HD BENCHMARK 4.0 RESULTS

Please do NOT compare it with older versions of the benchmark!

Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data

to http://forums.techarp.com/reviews-articles/26363-x264-hd-benchmark-4-0-a.html

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Results for x264.exe r1913

==========================

Pass 1

------

encoded 1442 frames, 207.33 fps, 3911.63 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 202.07 fps, 3911.63 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 203.93 fps, 3911.63 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 204.86 fps, 3911.63 kb/s

Pass 2

------

encoded 1442 frames, 52.61 fps, 3959.57 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 52.57 fps, 3959.38 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 53.26 fps, 3960.14 kb/s

encoded 1442 frames, 53.11 fps, 3959.96 kb/s

System Details

--------------

Also the link's to the non re-sized screenshot's

http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/5967/48ghz.jpg

http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/986/52ghztest.jpg

 

[JMMP]

Very nice scores!

 

[Damien c]

Very nice scores!

Thank's looked through the 25 pages of result's on that site and there are only 3 or 4 people that have better scores on 1 part or both part's

Tempted next week to go for a Sandy Bridge E board, and cpu but not to sure yet as I really want the Cosmos 2 case and if I go Sandy Bridge E I won't be able to get it straight away.

 

[FTLN]

Thats some mental speed's there you got on the 2700k .... Would be nice to some some Ivy Bridge Benches when there out

 

[JMMP]

Thank's looked through the 25 pages of result's on that site and there are only 3 or 4 people that have better scores on 1 part or both part's

Tempted next week to go for a Sandy Bridge E board, and cpu but not to sure yet as I really want the Cosmos 2 case and if I go Sandy Bridge E I won't be able to get it straight away.

Go for the Cosmos II mate!

 

[Damien c]

Go for the Cosmos II mate!

Yeah decided on going with that.

There will be a long thread posted next week in the Rig Gallery section as I have 4 pc's to rebuild and not long to do it all in.

2 will have custom water loop's

1 will be using a Corsair H50 or H80 not decided yet as it's currently using a H50, but I have a H80 sat here not being used.

1 will be using a Akasa Venom or the H50 or H80.

Pc's are Mine, my dads, my brother in laws, and my brother in laws brother so fun times ahead next week.

 

[Rastalovich]

Thats some mental speed's there you got on the 2700k .... Would be nice to some some Ivy Bridge Benches when there out

I'd be interested in memory informations.

 

[Damien c]

I'd be interested in memory informations.

For mine or for Ivy Bridge.

My current ram is this stuff running at stock speed's.

http://www.scan.co.uk/products/8gb-(2x4gb)-corsair-ddr3-vengeance-jet-black-lp-pc3-12800-(1600)-non-ecc-cas-9-9-9-24-xmp-15v

 

[Rastalovich]

Ah kewl.

So it's inherently the cpu hz that are being a factor.

Wonder if SSD v HDD makes any big differences.

 

[Damien c]

Ah kewl.

So it's inherently the cpu hz that are being a factor.

Wonder if SSD v HDD makes any big differences.

It's possible that the ssd made a difference, as it's not really holding the cpu back like a hdd would.

I can run it again tonight at 4.8ghz with the file copied over to the ssd rather than where it is when I ran it, which is in my download's folder on a Samsung 1tb hdd.