Kei
Member
TBH, no lcd technology has ever come close to a crt, but then a crt takes up a massive amount of room, uses a lot of power and produces plenty of heat.
The best of the screens I've seen is without a doubt the Sony PVM-A250 we have in work which are OLED. Excellent colours, perfect blacks, no back light bleed (as there isn't one) and great viewing angles. It ought to perform flawlessly since it costs more than most 4k screens and most 65"+ tvs too. (a million miles off the insane cost of the BVM-E250A) When they master OLED at higher screen sizes i might consider moving from plasma.
Have to agree with sub, I can't stand 16:9 or even worse 21:9 for computer use, needs to be 16:10. Blacks on my pva dell 2408wfp are better than any ips panel i've used. (ips purple glow in the blacks off axis drives me nuts) Colour wise i can't see much difference. Once calibrated i reckon it'd be too close to tell.
The best of the screens I've seen is without a doubt the Sony PVM-A250 we have in work which are OLED. Excellent colours, perfect blacks, no back light bleed (as there isn't one) and great viewing angles. It ought to perform flawlessly since it costs more than most 4k screens and most 65"+ tvs too. (a million miles off the insane cost of the BVM-E250A) When they master OLED at higher screen sizes i might consider moving from plasma.
Have to agree with sub, I can't stand 16:9 or even worse 21:9 for computer use, needs to be 16:10. Blacks on my pva dell 2408wfp are better than any ips panel i've used. (ips purple glow in the blacks off axis drives me nuts) Colour wise i can't see much difference. Once calibrated i reckon it'd be too close to tell.
