OC3D Review: OCZ Vertex 120GB SATA2 SSD

JN

New member
"With a read speed of 250MB/s, the OCZ Vertex serves up some serious speed....just not on a platter! Check out our review inside."

06192840868s.jpg


OCZ Vertex 120GB SATA2 SSD
 
Great review Jim. I'm glad to see that the stutter that plagued previous SSDs has been eradicated. The price is still a little high, but it's good to see OCZ progressing with their SSD line-up.

*Checks bank balance*
 
Good review mate.

Great performance but surely the cost needs to come down and the capacity up for them to become viable for the mainstream. :(
 
Fantastic to see them coming along like this. However, prices let me down hugely and therefore I won't be getting one for at least another year. I wish the prices would come down faster and become more main stream like 500GB HDDs :p
 
Price is going down, continue that trend and we might all buy one next year :) Very nice review, thanks for the read.
 
wow!I did not know they cost that much,have just been reading a build log where some guy has bought 8 of these babys!!would love to have a few in raid for myself
 
I hope he's put that on a PCI-e controller? :s I don't think the average northbridge is able of keeping up with that.
 
SouthBridge is the one you're after mate, the NB controlls other things ;)

He would be stupid to run it off an onboard RAID controller! As Monkey said, I hope it is on a dedicated RAID card!
 
name='monkey7' said:
I hope he's put that on a PCI-e controller? :s I don't think the average northbridge is able of keeping up with that.

yeah he has a dell perc i5 or something
 
replacing your OS hard disk with an SSD such as the Vertex instead of spending £300 on that 'new' graphics card just makes so much more sense.

A very very valid point, something I've been thinking about for quite a while..
 
name='Luigi' said:
A very very valid point, something I've been thinking about for quite a while..

Yeah for some reason I think quite a lot of people get stuck in the FPS trap. Upgrading to new graphics cards that make absolutely no difference to the games they play (other than fraps results) instead of investing in something like an SSD.

Yes it's expensive, yes it's 1/10th of the size of an F1 which costs 1/3rd of the price, but the performance is something you can see and appreciate.
 
name='Jim' said:
Yeah for some reason I think quite a lot of people get stuck in the FPS trap. Upgrading to new graphics cards that make absolutely no difference to the games they play (other than fraps results) instead of investing in something like an SSD.

Yes it's expensive, yes it's 1/10th of the size of an F1 which costs 1/3rd of the price, but the performance is something you can see and appreciate.

And.. you only need 60gb for vista and a fair few games, which is plenty.

The way I see it, my 260 can play all the games I want to play, so upgrading will have virtually no effect apart from emptying my wallet. An SSD on the other hand, will mean that pretty much everything will be noticeably faster- that's worth having :)

I liked the review Jim, but my wallet didn't :yumyum:
 
With respect, I seen the price and didn't think it was worth digesting any further.

@ £280 for 120g, even if it went at the full bus-capable speed, it's failed immediately.

£120 for 280g is still bad. Old physical drives are going to be rolling out 2Tb drives before we know it.

In all honesty, by the time price comes down, or the tech is overlooked by something more sensible, the performance figures of the product will be completely different.
 
name='Bungral' said:
Good man.... We would have had to part ways in our friendship otherwise!

Friendship remains intact. I'm waiting for them to hit retailers so I can buy another one and RAID them for some super sexy speeds ;)

On another note, the Macbook comes out of suspend in 0.00001 seconds anyway. So no need to reduce boot times :p
 
Back
Top