What's upsetting to me, when I think back to using AMD cpus/mobos and their comparisons with Intel, is the focus could be purely on the cpu's performance cos the rest of the mobo's features would ~more or less~ be equal in terms of connectivity/expansion etc.
For far too long the AMD equiv have been lacking what Intel would soon enough be regarding as basic. And I don't like seeing this.
Yes the mobo is great, it's an Asus mobo so I'd never buy it myself (that's a personal preference), if you game or whatever, there's definitely excuses to go AMD - cost and upgrade-ability continuing to be some good ones.
But, Intel are about to feature mobos with PCIe 3.0 and 'quad' channel memory, and I just get the impression that as soon as AMD mobos make these things standard, Intel will be pushing something else new that AMD don't do.
(I do grant them the sata and usb advance, but it's taken time and £11 cards can do these things)
Don't get me wrong, the AMD choice in cpus is definitely there, just not for me. And it certainly doesn't qualify, in my eyes, spending any 'big' money on them. If you're going to do that, get the Intel equiv.
For crying out loud, they're well aware of PCIe 3.0 cos they're obviously testing with it with their gfxcards for a while. Memory - gah ! They employ memory management on their gfxcards too.
I want to see them come out with something that combines the use of their cpus, their gfxcards, their innovations, something perhaps only they can do. They have the means.
I don't understand the Gold award, unless it's for being gold inside the AMD zone alone, cos for mobos in general it's all a bit meh for me.