name='macgamesrule' said:http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/06/30/blizzard-snubs-nvidia-diablo
There's one reason right there.
First off: the game will run on XP as well as Vista, with DirectX 10 being recommended but not required. As if that wasn't bad enough for the green team, which is working hard to shift new DX10 cards, the Direct X 10 included will be of the 10.1 variety - supported by DAAMIT but not the boys in green. This means that the best graphical experience might just be on ATI hardware.
name='macgamesrule' said:http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/06/30/blizzard-snubs-nvidia-diablo
There's one reason right there.
name='PP Mguire' said:Well 10.1 showed a clear performance improvement for the ATI side of things in Assassins Creed until they released the patch that disabled it. Im sure if more games had support for 10.1 (like is being said will happen) then youd see the ATI side have a performance increase over Nvidia.
name='PP Mguire' said:True. But the question is why did the 1.1 patch for Assassins Creed take out 10.1?
name='PP Mguire' said:Well 10.1 showed a clear performance improvement for the ATI side of things in Assassins Creed until they released the patch that disabled it. Im sure if more games had support for 10.1 (like is being said will happen) then youd see the ATI side have a performance increase over Nvidia.