Monitor conundrum

the_bone_reaper

New member
Hey guys I need some help again I'm looking to upgrade to one of these two monitors to go with a Asus Strix 1080 T.I the first one is Acer Predator XB271HU 27" G-SYNC 2 144Hz (165Hz OC) 4MS IPS LED Gaming Monitor the second one is ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q 27" WQHD 4MS 144Hz (165Hz OC) G-SYNC IPS LED Gaming Monitor. If you need more information let me know
 
Last edited:
They're both pretty much the same. In fact, if I remember rightly they use the same panel. I could be wrong on that one as I haven't been keeping up to date with the minutia of screens. What you get with ASUS is slightly (and I mean slightly) better warranty services. They are both prone to quality issues, at least they were back they were released a year or so ago. You're playing an expensive lottery with these IPS displays. Many of them have glaring issues such as BLB, yellowing in the corners, 6-10 dead pixels, and other problems that should not exist on such an expensive product. I suspect quality and consistency has improved since last year, but you're not guaranteed a perfect monitor. Amazon stopped selling these initially because they were receiving so many returns. And frustratingly ACER and ASUS would just repackage them and send them back out. They wouldn't actually repair them because it would take too much work. Some struck gold; some struck yellow. Sorry for the pun.
 
Yes they have exactly the same panel. And i have forgotten about problems. They are epic monitors but you must check them at shop for BLB and dead pixels. Do not order them to your home address, because you could be in for a lot of pain. They didn't quite refine them before putting monitors on sale. And quality check wasn't on the level you would expect for 850 € monitor. People who RMA-ed them often got worse panels. Newer series may be better, but you can stumble on one that was sitting in storage for a year.

They are the best 1440p monitors but you need to be careful when buying.
 
I went for the PG278QR, same monitor just TN instead of IPS.
Came from a TN, and didn't want to be part of the lottery :)
Sat next to a guy at a lan party, he had a 4K IPS, didn't see a difference that would be worth it for gamer :D
And saved 1150DKK = 130£
 
I went for the PG278QR, same monitor just TN instead of IPS.
Came from a TN, and didn't want to be part of the lottery :)
Sat next to a guy at a lan party, he had a 4K IPS, didn't see a difference that would be worth it for gamer :D
And saved 1150DKK = 130£

Yeah, that's what I did (BenQ model). I didn't want to play the monitor lottery just for IPS when I didn't absolutely need it and when the price was so much higher. No regrets. Maybe in a couple of years when a nice VA or IPS 144Hz 3440x1440p comes out I'll be enticed, but I'm happy with TN.
 
Ok i am leaning towards the asus. From what i have been reading and watching it seems like the better one but i think i will be doing a little more research before i spend $1199 australian
 
I have the ASUS PG278Q and I was unfortunate in the beginning to have a dead pixel in the middle of the screen. Then putted it away in the shelf for about 6 months and when getting it back out, it was fully functional again, no dead pixels.

There are some very small BLB in the left bottom corners, but that's about it. I must admit and be honest here that I am very disappointed in the absurd "quality control" these monitors have, especially given the immense price that you're paying for them. Might as well sell your kidney as you'd most likely have less issues than with these monitors.

I have gone through an Acer Predator X34 and an ASUS PG348Q (both IPSs) as well, both had massive BLB that it was absolutely horrible. Especially when having a dark background, as in movies etc, you'd see the BLB all around the monitors.

And these were even more expensive than my PG278Q, so I returned them both and stuck with my TN PG278Q and I'm glad I did. Sure it's expensive, but I call myself pretty lucky with my small amount of issues on my monitor today.

I know that Dicey had major issues with his and got like, what? 7 total returns of the same monitor? Due to the lack of, again, "quality control" and them being refurbished rather than actually fixed. So yes, in comparison to him, I feel very lucky having this monitor today.
But I also didn't have a painless start as mentioned above.

My advice to you... Don't go IPS, atleast not today. TN may not be as "awesome", but surely, from a day to day basis, I can bet my ridicolous salary that no one in here would even notice the difference of an IPS compared to an TN. Unless they would be side by side. Which the average user doesn't really have or use, on a daily basis, to be honest.

Like AngryGoldfish also mentioned above, maybe in a couple of years IPS has matured enough and the quality control has come to an acceptable level, in comparison to the prices the manufacturers are asking for their products.
 
Last edited:
I don't really understand any of that I don't really understand how or what makes the monitors work I just I want to good monitor that I can play games on without having to go into the details
 
I don't really understand any of that I don't really understand how or what makes the monitors work I just I want to good monitor that I can play games on without having to go into the details

That is what everyone wants my friend, but the reality is that it ain't that black and white unfortunately. You need to do some research on the monitor(s) you're considering, to see how well they have been received by other people.
 
I don't really understand any of that I don't really understand how or what makes the monitors work I just I want to good monitor that I can play games on without having to go into the details

I have a BenQ XL2730Z, a 1440p/144Hz Freesync TN panel that cost me £350 (which at the time was about €450). It's a very solid panel for the money. The IPS equivalent was £400 but plagued with issues. My BenQ has two dead pixels. That's all that's wrong with it. And two-three dead pixels are not a deal breaker at this resolution as it's very hard to spot them. However any more than that and I'd be a bit annoyed. Past five and I'd consider requesting a refund or replacement. Severe black-light-bleed (some BLB is always going to be a thing with IPS panels) is a deal breaker as it ruins immersion when playing a game like Alien Isolation or Far Cry Blood Dragon, but it's not usually a problem with TN panels. Yellowing in the corners is not acceptable in an IPS panel that snobs tout as 'so much better coz colour accuracy, bro'. Yellowing is also not a common problem with TN. This is why I recommend a cheaper TN panels that have the features you want. I would only recommend IPS or VA if you work with video or photography. The price increase is not worth the risk and potential heartache/headache.

tl;dr: If you want a monitor that just 'works' and allows you to game freely, get a nice £400-500 1440p TN panel. If you work with photography or video, save up and risk an IPS panel.
 
Last edited:
Or you could wait until the end of 2017 where the Asus rog swift PG27VQ monitor comes out, 27"-165Hz-curved-1m/s response time and quantum dot technology(better colors quality).I was in the same dilemma as you are right now and i decided to wait a bit more!I guess it's price will be more or less the same as the PG279Q.
 
Last edited:
I'm still a n00b around here, but I've been using a Wasabi Mango UHD430 (43" 4K@60Hz monitor) for about a year now and while it's not the best panel on the market, it's been good to me.
4hPO4omh.jpg
 
Back
Top