many overclocking issues

[jamesriley94]

But I thought that really anything over 1600mhz wouldn't really make a difference?

Yeh, I said that in one of my first posts...

...then again later...

Been ignored every time.

 

[DWC]

2400mhz at cl 9 does make a difference http://www.komplett.no/k/ki.aspx?sku=755448

 

[seumasbeathan]

A difference in what exactly?

 

[DWC]

so that my cpu can save and retrieve faster

 

[jamesriley94]

No...

Windows cannot operate with RAM at those kind of speeds. Anything over 1600mhz makes no difference in the running of programs whatsoever.

You'll only ever see differences in benchmarks.

 

[seumasbeathan]

so that my cpu can save and retrieve faster

You have a 3930k oc'd to 4.6ghz, Does it really need to be any faster?

 

[Yeren]

but surely nothing noticeable by the human brain?

 

[DWC]

its not windows that uses ram, cpu uses ram as short memmory

 

[Yeren]

windows does use ram

even i know that

 

[DWC]

i tought this was a enthusiast site, x3, windows uses ram thru cpu not directly to ram.
if this was a enthusiast site then i dont care if ram brakes, my cpu is watercooled custom, i try get my pc to the edge of what i can do x.x

 

[seumasbeathan]

Post a link to some benchmarks that show that 2400mhz makes a difference

 

[jamesriley94]

i tought this was a enthusiast site, x3, windows uses ram thru cpu not directly to ram

Whatever way you want to dress it up - there's still no performance increase whatsoever in running RAM faster than 1600mhz

/end

 

[DWC]

in benchmarks there is and 2-5 fps

 

[Yeren]

i tought this was a enthusiast site, x3, windows uses ram thru cpu not directly to ram.
if this was a enthusiast site then i dont care if ram brakes, my cpu is watercooled custom, i try get my pc to the edge of what i can do x.x

then shouldnt you be using DICE? that'll take you further than watercooling but seems you just wanna shout louder than the person posting next to you.

sound advice has been offered to you, but you have chosen to ignore 95% of it

 

[jamesriley94]

Yes, sorry SeumaS ( ) in benchmarks there is a difference between 1600mhz and 2400mhz.

But in actual program usage in real world applications, there's no difference

 

[Josh Weston]

Yeah, ±3% or something stupid.
I'm running fast RAM, and there really isn't any difference whatsoever.

 

[DWC]

i do got nitrogen but im not finished with my test bench x.x

 

[DWC]

i have listened to all what u all say but i cant agree on everything just like that since i need to find out whats right or not myself but i dont forget whats im being told

 

[jamesriley94]

ok, please tell us specifically what you dont agree with us on, and we'll explain very simply why we are right.

 

[Josh Weston]

The memory, as you say, is controlled by the CPU. But...guess what the CPU is controlled by? It's not just running by itself, the OS is. The extra speed REALLY doesn't make much any difference whatsoever, it just costs more.