Load Line Calibration

Bented

New member
Hi,

For a 4.6Ghz and a 4.8Ghz OC... What Load Line Calibration setting would be best?
It like goes from Level 1-9 and AUTO.

The chip is a 4790k on a Maximus VII Formula.

I want to aim for a stable OC with a vcore of around 1.24-1.26v then with LLC, would I be correct in thinking that a smaller Level would give just a little support to maintain the final stable Vcore?

Thanks
 
Hi,

For a 4.6Ghz and a 4.8Ghz OC... What Load Line Calibration setting would be best?
It like goes from Level 1-9 and AUTO.

The chip is a 4790k on a Maximus VII Formula.

I want to aim for a stable OC with a vcore of around 1.24-1.26v then with LLC, would I be correct in thinking that a smaller Level would give just a little support to maintain the final stable Vcore?

Thanks

You can't just say 4.6ghz OC with 1.24 vcore and expect it to work. Your chip might only get to 4.6Ghz at 1.3 volts. It all depends. Its better to go see it as this is the best clock i can get at this amount of volts. Typically you do not want to go above 1.3v with any intel chip from ivy bridge to now.
 
You can't just say 4.6ghz OC with 1.24 vcore and expect it to work. Your chip might only get to 4.6Ghz at 1.3 volts. It all depends. Its better to go see it as this is the best clock i can get at this amount of volts. Typically you do not want to go above 1.3v with any intel chip from ivy bridge to now.

Hi,

No sorry I think I explained it wrong. I was not just expecting that to happen.

I have a question regarding Vcore on the newer chips/boards.

When I use the latest Prime95 (which I understand uses more AVX) I've got the Vcore set manually to 1.234v but in TPU it should a voltage underload of 1.248v but in coretemp it shows as 1.233v and in CPU-Z as 1.232v.

Taking a manual reading from the board it reads 1.24v.
Is there a reason why it's pushed above the vcore I'm setting?
Is this because of the AVX utilization ? if that is the case I thought that AVX would only push vcore above if it was set to adaptive?

Can anyone shed any light on this please?
 
I only use vroop when I have an overclocked cpu and speedstep enabled with voltage scaling, so that the voltage falls during the load, and the voltage is also higher on other performance states
 
I only use vroop when I have an overclocked cpu and speedstep enabled with voltage scaling, so that the voltage falls during the load, and the voltage is also higher on other performance states

i agree with this.
if you set a constant voltage with speed step off. then you shouldn't need to worry about v drop.
I prefer the dynamic voltages using offsets and load calibration. using turbo mode as my over clock. with non load on the cpu being as close to stock as possible.

it is really a matter of tweak as you can. but i do try and use the lowest settings and then add to the turbo mode offset to compensate.
i then use IBT to put the cpu under 100% load and monitor my Core voltages on 3 apps. to verify they are all telling me the same thing.
if they tell me i am above my max target voltages at 100% load. then i go change the offset for turbo mode back down until i get to my target at full load.
then i test some stressful games that i know will expose an unstable clock.
(all the 3d mark tests. thief bench mark, and a few online laps in assetto corsa)
if the system can manage that then its golden "as long as its also within my temp threshold" if it cant manage that. my only choice then is to lower the clock speeds.

I will also physics bench my cpu at the voltage and then a lower voltage. When i reach a point where the system is stable and scoring the same physics score as it did with higher voltages, then that it done. and those are the safe 24/7 clocks for my cpu. if i lower the voltages one more and the physics score drops (outside of the margin of error) i know that those voltages are to low.

That is my preferred method of doing it.
i know a lot of people prefer manual voltages with speed step/turbo off as they say you can get the same clocks with lower voltages.
i have to believe that the benefits of idle mode which means lower voltages and temperatures is better for my system as it is on 24/7 so for the sake of 2-300mhz i chose the offset method
 
What I did was set to adaptive leaving + and then entering my stable vcore of 1.24v @ 4.6Ghz in the "Additional Turbo Mode CPU Core voltage" area.
I have the "CPU Core Voltage Offset" left at AUTO.
It won't allow me to set the EXACT stable vcore of 1.24063v but maybe that's because there is not much in it.
(or maybe this is exactly what TTL was speaking about in his ASUS MVII Formula review)

I think that's correct, the way I have done it? It scales up and down as I'd expected and the slight increase I get no matter if I set Vcore 1.24063v manually or using adaptive. I still see the same 1.248-1.263v (depending on stressing) increase. Not decrease (vdroop) despite setting a manual voltage of 1.24063v.

Not sure if I misunderstood but I'm speaking about an increased voltage not vdroop?
 
dont have them set to auto.. you should have something like "manual, auto and dynamic"
you really shouldnt use auto for any of the voltage controls when over clocking.

having just said that i dont have that board and i guess they could have named dynamic "auto" for some unknown reason. but i really doubt they did. but many others do have that board so they will know better.
 
dont have them set to auto.. you should have something like "manual, auto and dynamic"
you really shouldnt use auto for any of the voltage controls when over clocking.

having just said that i dont have that board and i guess they could have named dynamic "auto" for some unknown reason. but i really doubt they did. but many others do have that board so they will know better.

From my understanding... you set the vcore in the Turbo field so that this is the max allowed voltage under turbo. This over rides the CPU voltage offset field. As it will scale voltages with the speeds up to what I've set in Turbo voltage. At least that is how I understand it. And I'm not seeing anything happen any differently the way I have it set than I do using fully manual mode.

But I was also hoping for some clarification on the above stuff I wrote from people having a board that uses the same kind of BIOS.

I was reading this initially to get started... this is where the turbo vcore is mentioned.
http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?33680-Beginner-Adaptive-Voltage-4pin-CPU-power
 
Back
Top