LG and Samsung are launching on smaller OLED Screens in 2022 for TVs and Monitors

[WYP]

Expect 34-inch and 42-inch TV screens for OLED TVs/Monitors next year.



Read more about the future of OLED monitors.

 

[NeverBackDown]

I wish they brought it down to 27", but I realize it's probably not worth their investment. It's incredibly expensive to produce and making tiny panels per sheet more than likely wouldn't deliver the volume to make it profitable.

Still Samsung's 34" monitor sounds promising. More manageable than 42". Though I could see a bedroom console setup benefiting from 42". Just not a PC situation

 

[Warchild]

I wish they brought it down to 27", but I realize it's probably not worth their investment. It's incredibly expensive to produce and making tiny panels per sheet more than likely wouldn't deliver the volume to make it profitable.

Still Samsung's 34" monitor sounds promising. More manageable than 42". Though I could see a bedroom console setup benefiting from 42". Just not a PC situation

im not quite sure why they went this route really.. ASUS tried to start the movement with their BFG screens, but I don't think they really took off very well? Could be wrong, but it seems that "tv screens" were just no comparison to dedicated monitors.

I welcome the idea of OLED of course, but the costs here are just astronomical.

 

[Dicehunter]

I'm still waiting for my dream desk monitor, 32," 4K, 144Hz, 1Ms response time, HDR1000+, Full array backlight dimming, VRR and not costing an arm and a leg would be nice ^_^

 

[NeverBackDown]

im not quite sure why they went this route really.. ASUS tried to start the movement with their BFG screens, but I don't think they really took off very well? Could be wrong, but it seems that "tv screens" were just no comparison to dedicated monitors.

I welcome the idea of OLED of course, but the costs here are just astronomical.

I don't think they tried either. Nvidia tried to get into the console market by making people get BFG displays, but really hasn't worked out.

Agreed on OLED. It's just to expensive. They need to figure it out otherwise monitors will be a market they won't get into. Console players aren't into expensive monitors. Just any 1080p 144hz monitor will do and PC market won't buy it. At that point I'd rather get a massive OLED TV for the whole family.

I'm still waiting for my dream desk monitor, 32," 4K, 144Hz, 1Ms response time, HDR1000+, Full array backlight dimming, VRR and not costing an arm and a leg would be nice ^_^

You'll be waiting a long time

 

[jcchg]

I'm still waiting for my dream desk monitor, 32," 4K, 144Hz, 1Ms response time, HDR1000+, Full array backlight dimming, VRR and not costing an arm and a leg would be nice ^_^

32", 1000 nits at 60-80 cm from the screen, I wonder what you'd get first, a headache or getting blind.

And for 4K gaming you need a RTX 3080 Ti minimum, not native content looks awful in a monitor, and weaker GPUs don't deliver 4K DLSS Ultra 60 fps.

 

[Warchild]

32", 1000 nits at 60-80 cm from the screen, I wonder what you'd get first, a headache or getting blind.

And for 4K gaming you need a RTX 3080 Ti minimum, not native content looks awful in a monitor, and weaker GPUs don't deliver 4K DLSS Ultra 60 fps.

I still think 4k is overrated. And if you are concerned about 60cm from the screen, i suggest never to play VR gaming

 

[NeverBackDown]

32", 1000 nits at 60-80 cm from the screen, I wonder what you'd get first, a headache or getting blind.

And for 4K gaming you need a RTX 3080 Ti minimum, not native content looks awful in a monitor, and weaker GPUs don't deliver 4K DLSS Ultra 60 fps.

When you quote nits for HDR it's really about the bright highlights in the scene. It's not necessarily everything at max brightness. If that's the case there's no reason for contrast to exist
I think this is what Dice is referring to

That said if the entire scene went to bright white then yes you'd definitely not be comfortable.