SieB New member Apr 19, 2012 #21 65 *c at 4.6ghz on a stock cooler... nothing to worry about there then, especially seen as it's faster clock for clock so that 4.6ghz is equivalent to 4.8ghz+ from a 2600k.
65 *c at 4.6ghz on a stock cooler... nothing to worry about there then, especially seen as it's faster clock for clock so that 4.6ghz is equivalent to 4.8ghz+ from a 2600k.
A AndyMosh New member Apr 19, 2012 #22 I'm taking the review with a grain of salt, especially seen as it's leaked, waiting for all the proper reviews on monday. Looks like the link has been closed, we'll have to find out for sure next week.
I'm taking the review with a grain of salt, especially seen as it's leaked, waiting for all the proper reviews on monday. Looks like the link has been closed, we'll have to find out for sure next week.
D DIGITALI5 New member Apr 19, 2012 #23 it does sound good, unless there is some massive heat increase if you increase the voltage anymore than they have already?
it does sound good, unless there is some massive heat increase if you increase the voltage anymore than they have already?
L Lauralarry New member Apr 19, 2012 #24 i got a HD 4850 and im putting it in my ivybridge build until I can afford a real Nvidia card
M MaXiMiZe New member Apr 20, 2012 #25 Shame as it's not so good of an overclocker compared to Sandy.
