Intel X79 Core i7 4960X Review

I was looking at the ASUS Z87 Maximus VI Extreme as an alternative to X79. Like I said: 3 to 4 GPUs in that setup will be primarily for looks not gaming experience. I think I will turn off SLI/Crossfire 99% of the time and use the other cards for Folding@Home or something like that.

That's why I personally do favor the AMD solution a little bit more. The reason I would favor the nVidia setup is due to the SLI-Bridge, which esthetically looks more pleasing than these yellow crossfire bridges.

But without new motherboards I don't think that there are that many alternatives. The Gigabyte Z87 boards have fans and what's even worse water cooling fittings mounted on them. I don't understand why GigaByte insists on putting fittings on them and not just G1/4.

And the X79 series motherboards have been released since ages - or at least it feels that way.

Keep in mind though, that every GPU running Folding@Home will take away one thread (or if I am unlucky a core). That's why initially thought it would be better to go with Ivy-Bridge-E.
 
Chipsets anyone?

So the big conclusion to be drawn from this test is, that what we need is a mobo combining the socket 2011 with the Z87 chipset. If that is even possible it might be something for ASUS, Rampage V Extreme:rolleyes:
 
Vcore voltage

i get 4,6Ghz att 1,296 and 4,8Ghz att 1,344... stable
in manual mode i put in 1.275 but the loadline probably push it up a bit ? since cpuz say 1.296.. i wish there was a OC guide on the ramapage and ive-e as you did the with the z77 gigabyte oc guide.
 
i get 4,6Ghz att 1,296 and 4,8Ghz att 1,344... stable
in manual mode i put in 1.275 but the loadline probably push it up a bit ? since cpuz say 1.296.. i wish there was a OC guide on the ramapage and ive-e as you did the with the z77 gigabyte oc guide.

That is a very good chip mate. The fact that it even got 4.8GHz stable at all is pretty damn good. Keep it as it is and you'll be fine :)
 
Back
Top