Intel 6xx Series CPU

Ace

New member
Intel 6xx Series

In the last year or so amd has been kicking ass in the enthusiast market and Intel’s Prescott hasn’t really been a rival. One good thing is Intel went back to the drawing board and come up with the line of 6xx cpus.

More Cache-

The new line features an extra 1mb of L2 which makes up a little in benchmarks. The cache shines in applications and games where the cpu can avoid accessing slower main memory. Intel needed to increase the die-size from 122 to 135mm in order to accommodate the 169 million transistors where as the original Prescott had 125. It’s actually a pretty small looking chip and that’s because of the 90nm process.

Enhanced Speedstep Technology-

Another new feature is the enhanced speedstep technology which was taken from the Pentium M lineup. The way speedstep works is that it decreases power consumption by dynamically adjusting or scaling cpu clock speeds and voltages. This is beneficial because you decrease heat. This is great for a large scale company that uses hundreds of computers. It’s almost like being in idle mode instead of constantly running your comp at full power.

Execute Disable Bit-

This is taken from the Itanium core and helps fight specific types of hacking. If there’s a buffer overflow in a network that can allow vulnerability to worms and viruses. This Execute Disable Bit allows the cpu to designate some areas in the system memory that code is able to run and not run. In a network where a worm enters code this feature disables its code execution so it can’t hurt the users system.

64 Bit-

An obvious one is 64 bit architecture. With XP Pro’s release of XP64 this is a great time to have a cpu capable of this. Intel has named this EM64T and is also using this for Xeon and dual core cpus.

90nm-

As we all know the 90nm process is a great overclocker and it’s great on this cpu. Users are easily getting to 4.0+ GHz on air and water and phase change are seeing 4.5-5.0+. Along with the 2mb of L2 these cpus are an incredible value. The Extreme Edition 3.73 is nothing more than an overclocked 640 with the multi dropped to 14. With the 478 EE’s the extra 2mb of L3 brought something new but not existent this time around which is a little disappointing. All in all this is a great cpu and anyone on a budget should consider this.
 
Good guide man. Sorry, I have to be a cheeky prick (myself! :)) but who would want one vs. Athlon 64? ;)

Anyway, Nice guide. Reps!
 
2mb L2 cache, HT, great for anything really and will only lose to an A64 in gaming. and of course conventiional overclocking methods lol
 
name='Dave' said:
2mb L2 cache, HT, great for anything really and will only lose to an A64 in gaming. and of course conventiional overclocking methods lol

yea they will lose in the gaming section, but i honestly find not a big difference b/w chips....but thats just me, i like the 6** series becuase ilikee to edit and play games, im, brosw listen to music, but u bet and AMD can do tht as welll
 
NickS_ said:
Good guide man. Sorry, I have to be a cheeky prick (myself! :)) but who would want one vs. Athlon 64? ;)

Anyway, Nice guide. Reps!

Well let's see.. Lots of people :)

Intel feels faster than AMD, it's just speedier in Windows. I don't need 1.5 fps more in my games thanks.
 
Yup, even tho i love my new AMD, i still hold a torch for my P4.

It used to totally rip through encoding, video/photo editing, and also felt a bit quicker booting into and navigating around windows.

However, my AMD totally PWN's at games, giving me at least a 40fps increase over my old P4 running when it was running at 4.5ghz.
 
XMS said:
Yup, even tho i love my new AMD, i still hold a torch for my P4.

It used to totally rip through encoding, video/photo editing, and also felt a bit quicker booting into and navigating around windows.

However, my AMD totally PWN's at games, giving me at least a 40fps increase over my old P4 running when it was running at 4.5ghz.

40 fps? jesus christ are you sure? maybe this is a game that is heaps cpu bound lol. i can run everything max perfectly on every game i've tried.
 
name='Austin' said:
40 fps? jesus christ are you sure? maybe this is a game that is heaps cpu bound lol. i can run everything max perfectly on every game i've tried.

This was Unreal 2003's benchmark.exe that showed me an extra 35-40 fps when my AMD was oc'd to 3.1ghz.
 
name='XMS' said:
This was Unreal 2003's benchmark.exe that showed me an extra 35-40 fps when my AMD was oc'd to 3.1ghz.

Ah, that'd be about right then :)

Anywho, Nick, as I was saying the CPU with the 31 stage pipeline infact does speed around windows :D
 
name='NickS_' said:
Then we can compare! :)

Compare? We have already compared. Jim has already compared. We don't need to compare. Infact it was compared with a 3.1GHz San Diego, and the result is the P4 wins in speediness of Windows. No more comparing needed.
 
my last amd system was an nf7 with a mobile xp at 2.6G but I have not tried a amd64 yet.I can tell you my 640 at 4.3G and memory at 5-2-2-2 5/4 and my x800xt clocked at 620/580 will time demo doom3 at 92.5fps at 1280x1024, high quality.I dont think the a64,s get much higher than that do they?

Also 1024x768, ultra quality 106.8fps

1280x1024,ulta quality 82.2 fps
 
you cant get over 60fps in doom 3 reason: doom 3 has a constant refresh rate of 60hz there for the game can only refresh the worlds model@ 60fps, thats why sli dosnt affect doom 3 at all, theres no way of changing the refresh rate
 
name='XfX LoVeR' said:
you cant get over 60fps in doom 3 reason: doom 3 has a constant refresh rate of 60hz there for the game can only refresh the worlds model@ 60fps, thats why sli dosnt affect doom 3 at all, theres no way of changing the refresh rate

There is a way of bypassing its 60 fps lock.. I just forgot how to do it :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top