I'll elaborate a bit...
Atm I can see two possibilities, one neat and tidy, the other convenient.
My loop goes Res > Pump > RAD1 > CPU > RAD2 > GPU > Res.
Now, I can place the res next to the pump on the bottom of the case, which yields the shortest tube run and the most "neat" finish.
Or I can place the res above the RAD2, on the "ledge" where the second drive cage goes in the TT Armor, making it the highest component in the loop but yielding a longer pipe run.
Now, do longer pipe runs (about 40cm more on the second setup over the first) have a negative impact on the overall performance of the loop?
Besides, with the second setup the water needs to be propelled up again from the GPU block to the res, does this affect negatively to the pressure in the loop? I'm sorry if this question sounds very stupid, but my knowledge of hydraulics is... well, that water is wet and if spilled it's volume expands proportionally to how likely the surface where it was spilled on is to get damaged by it.
Atm I can see two possibilities, one neat and tidy, the other convenient.
My loop goes Res > Pump > RAD1 > CPU > RAD2 > GPU > Res.
Now, I can place the res next to the pump on the bottom of the case, which yields the shortest tube run and the most "neat" finish.
Or I can place the res above the RAD2, on the "ledge" where the second drive cage goes in the TT Armor, making it the highest component in the loop but yielding a longer pipe run.
Now, do longer pipe runs (about 40cm more on the second setup over the first) have a negative impact on the overall performance of the loop?
Besides, with the second setup the water needs to be propelled up again from the GPU block to the res, does this affect negatively to the pressure in the loop? I'm sorry if this question sounds very stupid, but my knowledge of hydraulics is... well, that water is wet and if spilled it's volume expands proportionally to how likely the surface where it was spilled on is to get damaged by it.