See topic - I recently got my 2600k up and running with a noctua nh-d14 cooling it. I have it at 5 GHz (simple x50 multiplier) with 1.465 volts on an ASRock z68 extreme7 gen3 board.
It is not really prime95 stable... I think it may pass hours of testing, but small FFTs (specifically 8k) make it get WAY too hot... it is between 90-95C during that test (which is 10-20C hotter than other tests make it). I'm not willing to really run the test for hours to see if it actually survives.
However, during other prime95 tests, 3dmark11 physics loops, gaming, etc, temps stay at 75C or less. Idle temps are 25-30C. So, I'm thinking that this is a stable clock for my purposes, since I don't do anything more CPU intensive than gaming. Is this a terrible idea? I do love the idea of a 5 GHz CPU, but if it means that the chip is only gonna last like a year, I'll scale it back to 4.7-4.8 and see what the temps are.
Thanks.
It is not really prime95 stable... I think it may pass hours of testing, but small FFTs (specifically 8k) make it get WAY too hot... it is between 90-95C during that test (which is 10-20C hotter than other tests make it). I'm not willing to really run the test for hours to see if it actually survives.
However, during other prime95 tests, 3dmark11 physics loops, gaming, etc, temps stay at 75C or less. Idle temps are 25-30C. So, I'm thinking that this is a stable clock for my purposes, since I don't do anything more CPU intensive than gaming. Is this a terrible idea? I do love the idea of a 5 GHz CPU, but if it means that the chip is only gonna last like a year, I'll scale it back to 4.7-4.8 and see what the temps are.
Thanks.