sorry man, it was 3.30am and i was falling asleep so i kinda strayed ot :|
without knowing what the bios is set to at both speeds this is a stab in the dark but if 3.6 is 9*400 and 3.3 is 333*10 i think that you might of just gone up a strap on the nb and that has lost you some performance. as i dont know your board all that well i dont know where the straps are, i dont know where they all are on mine but i do know i have 1 at 500 fsb as i get a drop there from 499 and i need to get to 520 again to get the same performance as 499. along with going up a strap you might of gone up a performance level or 2 on your ram aswell. try seeing what memset says your ram timings are on both and test the memory bandwidth with aida64 or sisoft because this might be a case of where faster isnt always faster.
performance will go up until the board (and ram) needs to drop its timings and then you lose some, now this is like a bottleneck for your cpu as while its working faster it still needs to wait for the board and ram to feed it. if this is the case you could try a lower cpu multi and higher fsb again but that might need you to drop the ram timings to 5-5-5-15 so they can do the mhz you need them to.
its the fine tuning like this that causes the most headaches, as sometimes dropping a couple of mhz can give you better preformance even if logic says it shouldnt. you need to ballance the speed with the latency (for the nb and the ram) to get the best results.
My CPU has a x10 multi - 360BC*10= 3.6GHz
Tallun has a P5Q Deluxe which is essentially the little brother to the Premium. The BIOS is likely to be basically identical. Yeah I know since I don't have a 1:1 FSB to RAM ratio (it's 5:6) it means that for every 5 cycles the CPU does the RAM does 6. Even a 1:2 ratio would be better. It's having to wait for a difficult decimal equation.
Erm, is there some email address that I can direct to? As it's probably a good idea that I take a video or some pictures of the BIOS, and then you can work some stuff out?
Cheers,
Alistair