Evil Huang give Fermi DX12 WDDM 2.0 Win10 driver

Status
Not open for further replies.
So what you're saying is, it's not actually playing it at the settings you had it set on then is it?

And thus it's not comparable to current benchmarks on modern cards that know wtf AO is either?


AO is reduced on High as you can see in my MGS V TPP. It looks amazing and perform very nice without recording,thats what i am calling true maximum optimised game, to run on crap gpu at 1080p nice.....not like unplayable batman AK, and other batmans are maxed out 1080p fine..have a nice day,gamer :D:cool:
 
AO is reduced on High as you can see in my MGS V TPP. It looks amazing and perform very nice without recording,thats what i am calling true maximum optimised game, to run on crap gpu at 1080p nice.....not like unplayable batman AK, and other batmans are maxed out 1080p fine..have a nice day,gamer :D:cool:

I tell you what is optimised.. Minesweeper, I get a solid 59FPS on my GT210.
 
im just gonna chime in here and say Bull @ other batman's run maxed out at 1080p on a 450
What do you consider a good frame rate?
i doubt any of the batman games at 1080p maxed out would manage a constant 30fps.

maxed out 1080p for you i seem to think is NOTHING like maxed out.
 
I have a 8800GTS 640 somewhere I might have to dig it out and give it the MGSV & Mad Max treatment see what's what.
 
im just gonna chime in here and say Bull @ other batman's run maxed out at 1080p on a 450
What do you consider a good frame rate?
i doubt any of the batman games at 1080p maxed out would manage a constant 30fps.

maxed out 1080p for you i seem to think is NOTHING like maxed out.

Its not bull....I was playing Batman arkham city completely maxed out with 32X AA at 1080p 30-31 fps sometimes dropping to 28.Oced gpu witj 344.47 icafe driver which is one of the best on fermi thermi..And i run ingame benchmark too same score amazing dx11 graphic. On another hand Arkham Origins was maxed out settings but reduced AA with no msaa offcourse and running 26-30 fps..only arkhma knight is truly unplayable...so pretty descent amazing graphics,i can play with 30 fps with no problem..ofcourse 60 or more is better that will wait for amd hbm 2 middle card to play next year ;)
 
Its not bull....I was playing Batman arkham city completely maxed out with 32X AA at 1080p 30-31 fps sometimes dropping to 28.Oced gpu witj 344.47 icafe driver which is one of the best on fermi thermi..And i run ingame benchmark too same score amazing dx11 graphic. On another hand Arkham Origins was maxed out settings but reduced AA with no msaa offcourse and running 26-30 fps..only arkhma knight is truly unplayable...so pretty descent amazing graphics,i can play with 30 fps with no problem..ofcourse 60 or more is better that will wait for amd hbm 2 middle card to play next year ;)


well there you go.
26-31fps is not acceptable.
you need to understand what running fine maxed out means. because 31fps max is a joke.
do your self and us a favour and get a new card..
you dont know what you are missing. and we do know what we are putting up with because of this.
 
well there you go.
26-31fps is not acceptable.
you need to understand what running fine maxed out means. because 31fps max is a joke.
do your self and us a favour and get a new card..
you dont know what you are missing. and we do know what we are putting up with because of this.

Its acceptable by me..i do not suffer to have constant 60 fps..yes new card at end of next year,but to be cheap 200 eur max :evil: cheap gaming man
 
maybe you should just buy a console. that way you can have 30fps and dont have to worry about drivers not supporting 1st gen dx11 cards when dx 12 comes out.
 
maybe you should just buy a console. that way you can have 30fps and dont have to worry about drivers not supporting 1st gen dx11 cards when dx 12 comes out.

I have x box 360 console i playing sometimes...and nvidia was promise dx12 fermi later this year, as i remember :headscratch::evil: have a nice day gamer. :crazy:
 
you dont understand.
You will get dx 12 ability. Lower Tier, like an amd 5770 will have dx 12 lower tier.
you cant just make a GPU do something it cant do with drivers..

You used to have to buy a new card to use dx-9 then a new card for dx-10. amd made dx 10.1 cards too.. then you had to have a new card for dx-11..
You have one of the 1st dx 11 cards. and you are complaining because you will be able to play dx12 games on it. But its a slow card so it wont play them well.. "of course it wont play them well the thing is ancient"

Your complaint is like saying it is not fair games do not come with 240x480 resolution options, so your old voodoo 2 card cant play GTA V and its all because they do not make drivers for it, and the games are poorly optimized.
Its a stupid argument.

The rest of the gaming world cant wait for people who still use a 8000 card, and they cant wait around for the 5770's and the 450's either..
But this 1 time in a long time they said you dont have to buy a new card. but your card will be slow. and you lose your mind.
 
Last edited:
you dont understand.
You will get dx 12 ability. Lower Tier, like an amd 5770 will have dx 12 lower tier.
you cant just make a GPU do something it cant do with drivers..

You used to have to buy a new card to use dx-9 then a new card for dx-10. amd made dx 10.1 cards too.. then you had to have a new card for dx-11..
You have one of the 1st dx 11 cards. and you are complaining because you will be able to play dx12 games on it. But its a slow card so it wont play them well.. "of course it wont play them well the thing is ancient"

Your complaint is like saying it is not fair games do not come with 240x480 resolution options, so your old voodoo 2 card cant play GTA V and its all because they do not make drivers for it, and the games are poorly optimized.
Its a stupid argument.

The rest of the gaming world cant wait for people who still use a 8000 card, and they cant wait around for the 5770's and the 450's either..
But this 1 time in a long time they said you dont have to buy a new card. but your card will be slow. and you lose your mind.

Yes i want that basic dx12...and we could gain 10-15 fps same as amd in ashes of singularity....thats not bad....it is interesting that some latest games are playable at maxed settings 1080p,meanwhile ac unity and batman ak is unplayable...thats interesting,, :happygangsta1:
 
Yes i want that basic dx12...and we could gain 10-15 fps same as amd in ashes of singularity....thats not bad....it is interesting that some latest games are playable at maxed settings 1080p,meanwhile ac unity and batman ak is unplayable...thats interesting,, :happygangsta1:

It's funny that you bring up that game considering that's an AMD title and you seem to bash the video card manufacturers for 'interfering with game development'?
 
It's funny that you bring up that game considering that's an AMD title and you seem to bash the video card manufacturers for 'interfering with game development'?

I only whine when it is hurting fps, i accept any dx12 boost go and work with developer :crazy:
 
Last edited:
whats "interesting" is you think 26fps is playable.
Games get better textures. better lighting. more objects on screen, less fogging..
This makes games look better. it is how it goes..

You could load doom 2 up now and say "Wow game very well optimized 70000 Fps maxed at 1024x768" of course its going to run well.. its a old game made for old hardware.
Batman AK was broken. they did not develop it properly for pc. that cannot be used as an example.
Assasins creed unity works fine. has some issues with AA hammering a gpu, but again its UBI soft. Just like batman game was made for consoles.
you cant blame drivers or nvidia for that..
What really annoys me is you have a 5 year old card, and compare 4-5 year old games to new releases.
you say the 4-5 year old games are better optimized. when the truth is they were made for the tech of the time. and lets be honest now. the 450 was never going to be recommended spec for games 4-5 years ago either. It was actually recommended to have a gtx 460 for arkham city, and even that was not expected to max the game out.
So even 4 years ago your card was not fast enough for new games. 4 more years have passed. and you seem to think it should be fast enough for next years games.

i feel like i am bashing my head against a wall here..
Your card is just old. Games are looking nicer. they use more advanced tech. your card is not good enough.
It wasn't good enough 4 years ago either.
its like you are trying to play playstation one games on a snes, and complain that the games are poorly optimized because mario land runs fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top