No, but Asus and Gigabyte also offer low end/mid range boards that are affordable.
EVGA don't.
The injustice, they make products for a particular audience.
JR
No, but Asus and Gigabyte also offer low end/mid range boards that are affordable.
EVGA don't.
No, but Asus and Gigabyte also offer low end/mid range boards that are affordable.
EVGA don't.
The injustice, they make products for a particular audience.
JR
The injustice, they make products for a particular audience.
JR
While I do like the look of the board, I am still slightly sceptical about EVGA boards, especially when it comes to the BIOS/UEFI. I can't really justify spending this amount on a board that may have a flakey BIOS, when I can get an ASUS, which I know will be reliable.
While I do like the look of the board, I am still slightly sceptical about EVGA boards, especially when it comes to the BIOS/UEFI. I can't really justify spending this amount on a board that may have a flakey BIOS, when I can get an ASUS, which I know will be reliable.
What's up the EVGA elitism dude? Everyone has there own experiences with motherboards... You can't blame them when EVGA used to be crap. Asus is the sure thing and more people are comfortable with that. Or any brand people have good experiences with, which again based off past products wouldn't be EVGA in the board department.
So what you're saying is your can't get a bad ASUS motherboard you can getting a bad anything in any brand
EVGA's last high end boards didn't even have UEFI.
EVGA have had UEFI since Z97 dude but not in Z87 or Z77
Right, so that pretty much ruled them out up until Z97.
I can only speak from experience dude. The two I had were tremendously quirky and EVGA had decided to do things completely differently from every one else at the time. The only thing I truly loved about my EVGA boards was that they let you split the memory completely from the FSB so you could hit the FSB like crazy using crap ram and get higher overclocks because of it. Having said that though both of the boards I had were £350 and £400 respectively so I guess if you could afford the price of admission you wouldn't be using crap ram.
Every review I've read of EVGA boards since has been bad due to the bios being weird. In Custom PC the only board to achieve over 50% was the Super Record.
The rest? all had odd bioses.
And that's why pretty much the whole world agrees with what I am saying.
Maybe their very latest boards are OK. But, if they don't send any out for review how the frig are we supposed to know?
So as I said, just because something is expensive that does not mean it's good.
It's not been that long for me that Asus have really had their crap together bios wise. Maybe 2-3 years tops. But they make the best AMD board I've ever used and my Rampage was so easy to overclock with that I could cry. I'm talking 20 seconds from first entering the bios to saving and exiting with a 4.7ghz overclock on a 3970x.
If they don't send any to to the UK how are we supposed to know they're any good?
As for the silicon lottery? I had already won it. However, what took me friggin ages on a MSI board took me seconds to do on the Asus.
P.S. Kind of ironic you have an Asus board.
Is this still getting bumped ^_^
Nobody at any point said EVGA motherboards were the best, were cheap, had the most solid BIOS or phenomenal price/performance. And nobody can vouch for this particular board because they don't have one, I don't even know anyone with a Z170 Classified, all I have done is seen them on the internet.
I have a Z97 Stinger, my friend has the X99 micro in a rig I built for him and i've seen the X99 Classified and Z170 Stinger in the flesh. They are all absolutely dank AF, stunning quality to hold, very logical and simple on UEFI side of things and not childishly overbranded. With the exception of an ASUS WS board (also not the best for 1337 overclocking or value) there isn't much on the market that LOOKS this serious and refined.
Now if I was going to recommend anything for having a solid BIOS and being excellent value it would be the ASRock Z170 OC Formula, it's cheaper than the equivalent EVGA, ASUS and MSI as well as being 8 packs board of choice, nothing speaks higher than that in terms of how well it performs. Objectively its phenomenal however i'm sure most would go for ASUS just because they like the branding and aesthetics as well as some little features. It's a similar story for EVGA, objectively they may not be optimal but they have a lot of things going for them. In my opinion having less features, less software, less BS justifies their premium, not many manufacturers offer such a simple and refined package. Personally I don't think thats because they are bad or lazy but that's just what they want to do and that's fine. I'm not going to do their manufacturing and marketing costing before I buy one to decide precisely what their margins are, if I like it and I find the price agreeable then they made a sale. Assuming I need another motherboard.
JR
I guess all you can do is watch American reviewers :lol:
I wouldn't trust them. The Americans love EVGA, mostly because they are based in the USA. If you listened to the yanks you would have beleived that the X58 Classified was the best motherboard ever made. Read a review over here in the UK though? crap.
They're a niche product made for Americans by Americans. Whether that will ever change? remains to be seen.
I doubt it though tbh. We're not as easy fooled as the yanks (both the Aussies and Brits are far more cynical)
Maybe it was to some people, You don't know how the motherboard is going to work until you get it to some people it might be crap to other people might be the best motherboard ever made it comes down to opinions again dude, The reviewer of the product had a bad time or didn't work for them but you buy it and it works great.
I have a Z97 Stinger