Core i7 920 overclocking guide

monkey7

New member
Core i7 920/940 overclocking guide

Ever since the i7 was first mentioned the rumour machine about overclocking it has been spinning at full speed. The first rumour was that overclocking would be impossible because of the removal of the good old FSB, leaving the overclockers with nothing to increase. After the first rush of panic people started to actually think about what would replace the FSB: base clock (BCLK). Increasing this would increase the overall clock, right? Right. After the lifting of the NDA (and on some dubious sites before) the overclocking results were released. An average core i7 920 (2.66gHz, €300) turned out to be able to overclock nearly a full gHz.

But removal of the FSB and the introduction of the BCLK means a lot more chances. Everything is linked to the BCLK, which has confused quite a lot of the old school overclockers. Just to sort that out and set new overclockers on the right path, I've written this guide to core i7 920 overclocking.

First of all: neither me nor overclock3d is responsible for the damage you might do to your components following this guide.

Step 1: preparation

To overclock properly you should first inform yourself about the risks and advantages of overclocking. I will not be writing this all out, but this is the short version:

Risks:

- Shortened life of components when giving more volts than specified

- Extremely shortened life of components when giving an extreme voltage

- System instability

- You could contract the Megahurtz fever

Disadvantages:

- Additional heat output

Advantages:

- Higher FPS in CPU based games

- More F@H ppd

- Higher benchmark scores

Does overclocking really increase performance?

Yes it does. Just look at the CPU scores below (program used: 3DMark vantage advanced)

At stock:

stock_hton.jpg


At 3.7gHz:

37ghz_hton.jpg


With a difference of about 6000 points this would represent a considerable increase in CPU based gaming performance.

Having read this, you should start concentrating on the theory behind core i7 overclocking. The system is pretty easy: you have a base clock (BCLK), to which everything is linked using multipliers. This base clock can be adjusted from 100 to 250 in steps of 1. Stock is 133.

Multipliers

The following multipliers are available:

- CPU. With the 920 this is 12-20x

- QPI link (36, 48, slow). The QPI isn't really important for singlecpu systems, but keep it below 7-8gHz as most seem to be bugging out around that range.

- Memory (6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16x). Well quite obvious. Make sure your ram is running as fast as possible but don't overdo it.

Voltages

When pushing hardware over its rated specifications it will most likely need more voltage to run properly. The following major voltages are available on the i7:

- vCore. This is the juice going through the actual core. Stock: 1.18 Max. safe: 1.35 Max. extreme: somewhere around 1.55

- VTT (asus names it different). This voltage is going through the memory multiplier which is now integrated into the processor unit. Stock: 1.1-1.2 Max. safe: 1.35 Max. extreme: somewhere around 1.55

- vDIMM is going through the memory. Stock: 1.5-1.65 Max safe: 1.65 Max extreme: 1.5*VTT or VTT+0.7

Energy savings

As all experienced clockers know, Intel has some features built into their CPU's that lets them use less power when idling. Overclockers however, are not interested in that power consumption at all and those features go at the cost of stability.

The following features are recommended to be turned off:

- C1E state

- SpeedStep

HyperThreading

Revived from the old P4 days is hyperThreading (HT). HT basically means that a core is pretending to be two cores. In the i7 series Intel decided to have the cpu act like an octo core while being quad. This feature could be very useful in truely multithreaded applications but seems to make the cpu require 0.05 additional vCore. As long as you are not an extreme clocker or single/dualthreaded applications (games) user I'd recommend keeping it on. Personally I have it turned off for my F@H SMP client.

To be continued

After this weekend probably, as I have to work saturday as well as sunday.
 
Currently being too demolished by work to continue this evening. And besides, the camera's taken by my dad anyway ;)

Will probably take BIOS pictures tomorrow afternoon/evening :) After that I'll be able to continue the guide.

And welcome to OC3D sfroach :) Feel free to introduce yourself at the introductions forum and join the community :)
 
While fiddling with my own CPU I found out that increasing the uncore speed will increase temps dramatically. I hit 78 max. with 3300MHz uncore and now I'm hitting 73 max. with 3000MHz. Benchmark scores are barely lowered, maybe .050s in SuperPI.

I guess this uncore speed was also holding back my overclock. When I set it to 3600 I got a VERY familiar BSoD I was also getting at bclk 195.
 
Nice little starter guide :)

Imo i7 is a bit lame... Not fussed about benchmarks anymore, it's real world stuff that matters (games etc).
 
Thanks :) I'm hoping to write the actual guide tomorrow or the day after.

Benchmarks is really all the performance can be measured with at the moment... Most of my games just don't reach the limits of the cpu. Only FO3 does, and that's because it only uses one of the 8 or 4 threads.
 
That`s curious, I`m sure FO3 uses all my cores, I`ll have to double check that when I get home. Reaches about 26%, which is probably cos it`s relying on 1 core for it's use, but doesn`t appreciate that the cores are being spread.

Will remember to hug the G15 whilst I check.
 
You're welcome ^^

I'm still wanting to write part II of the guide, but my dad's gone to a friend in germany. And took the camera with him :|

EDIT: just noticed I placed this in the GPU o/c section :/ Could one of the admins move it the to the cpu o/c section?
 
Can you try and fully explain each step and why you are doing certain things please.

So many overclocking guides are "enormous long preamble about stuff everyone knows, now we start overclocking by raising the blck and as you all know we'll need the usual steps to get it stable which we've done*. Here are the results ..."

Which is quite annoying for those of us who know what a processor is, but might not fully understand the VTT/uncore/RAM divider etc stuff.

Thanks :)

VB

* Reminds me of an old Monty Python sketch actually. "To play the flute you blow across this end and move your fingers up and down".
 
heheh I will try :)

Might try to set up my mom's camera with a small tripod on my desk and try to take pictures that way... Really not looking forward to waiting another few days until my dad comes home again with the camera -.-

While typing this, I got an idea: what if I put the newbie parts in grey, making them clearly different from the more advanced parts? That would make the guide readable to both user groups.
 
Wouldn't it be easier to split the guide in two? A "overclocking basics to get a small increase" which includes lots of explanations and descriptions as part one, and a more extreme 'clocking guide as part two which could then dispense with the basic explanatory stuff and just get to the meat of hitting a stable 4ghz.

That way those who just want to get to 965 levels without the outlay can just bump the bclk and those who don't mind 60deg idle can just read the advanced bit.

Just a thought.

VB
 
Fairly simple really 200bclk 1600mhz ram multi auto HT disabled 1.3875vcore 1.3v qpi nice stable cool overclock these chips are great overclockers and flies at 4ghz and have speedstep enabled so best of both worlds

can run 4.1 but requires about 1.43v @my current im still within intel specs and to be hinest the performance advantage from 4ghz to 4.1 sort of levels out at 4ghz

one more tip don't skimp on cooling wc I highy recommend.
 
Well. After spending about 3400USD on a new PC. I have to wait with the watercooling :). That will be next step, but possibly a few more months ahead. :)
 
Yes it makes you cpu alot cooler and allows higher clocks with lower volts and for my use it provides no gain I only game and use the O.S app's on this machine...have also heard many times that the o's sometimes assigns tasks to the virtual cores hindering performance
 
Darn, have to retype this because my internet bugged out when I submitted -.-

Currently running at 3.7gHz @ 1.35vCore, 1.34VTT, loadline calibration on (GigaByte only). Memory controller (uncore) frequency 3000MHz, HT & turbo on. When I'm below 60*C (which I usually am) the turbo is enabled, leaving me at 3.885gHz.

SuperPI I just did with autoCAD on the background was 10.832s. My record is 10.716s but I believe that was at 3.8gHz.
 
Back
Top