Well this "other" company making CoD products could at least use something they made for once instead of riding off everybody elses shirt tails. And for god sakes make something original. WW2 was so 2004.
Well this "other" company making CoD products could at least use something they made for once instead of riding off everybody elses shirt tails. And for god sakes make something original. WW2 was so 2004.
I'd have to agree with Maguire, the WW2-setting is getting pretty worn out now. Every other FPS features "real scenarios" from Nazi Germany and crap like that. I loved Modern Warface, as it was a game with real weapons, not crappy old wooden bolt action ancient rifles and
(not saying those aren't real, but you get my drift).
But I'll be giving the next CoD a chance, only because of Modern Warfare. If I hadn't played it, I wouldn't look twice at the next one.
is it just me or is a new cod game like released every month lol they really need to take some time on there games i mean they look good, good gameplay but nothing new
Cod2 - 4 using the same engine was ok because there was a big noticeable difference and they changed what the game was all about in it. This other company producing these off the wall CoD games are just riding on the popularity of the good CoD games. They need to make their own if they're gonna do this. Thats just my opinion though.
Same engine? It better have had twin turbos, new cams, nos and a whole load of other stuff added because the story is old too... CoD4 engine was ok when it came out, it needs a dx10 injection...