Smokers pay for that with enough left over to spend on a few tanks for Iraq.
The irony will be when there are no smokers and peoples are still dying of lung cancer, emphasima (spelling??) and increasing batches of asthma(spelling??).
Every1, including the stoopid, can verify that smoking is bad for u, that`s not up for debate.
What seems to be up for debate is that peoples think that the health service is burdened by them. I find that bizarre. Each pack (20), as verified by u`r friendly mobster-hm-customs official, carries with it £3.50-£4 in pure tax. I did the math off the top of my head in work a few years ago whilst the number of smokers in the UK was quoted on the radio (talk-sport I believe it was) - which was something like 4 million. Just do the math of an average pack a day (robbie williams reckons he smokes 3 packs, which is a total lie if u think about the timescale of a day ) x 365 x 3.75, and compare it to what the nhs spends on smoking related stuffs - which is a drop in the ocean in comparison.
The real question would be, what taxes would increase to cover what the present taxes go towards after the mere amount that goes to the nhs. There is a shortfall of some billions.
Anywho, after the wastage of a postage distribution came through the door, the ban doesn`t do anything more than I actually thought was the case at the moment.
I say let them smoke and increase the taxing. Be more concerned with the car emissions, which are a general problem rather than an obvious grouping problem.
Again, enjoy them whilst u can. The ones I pass on a daily basis in the city already seem empty compared to my younger days. Those that are still open that is. Trendy wine bars are opening and closing quite a bit mind u.