WYP
News Guru
AMD plans on enabling this feature with future firmware revisions.
Read more on X399's lack of NVMe RAID support.
Read more on X399's lack of NVMe RAID support.
AMD's Threadripper platform will reportedly not support NVMe RAID at launch
- Thread starter WYP
- Start date
Its hard to get drives - all our NVME drives have full OS and testing suites on them. We actually have an M.2 NVME and a 2.5" SSD for every platform.
SSD are actually pretty difficult to get enough of let alone have spares blank for stuff like this.
AngryGoldfish
Old N Gold
Wouldn't bother me personally.
Dark NighT
New member
I don't really see the point of raiding nvme drives, it wont make windows any faster if you boot of it, and almost nothing in the consumer market will utilize the speed of such a setup to 100%
Darkdayzzz
New member
Raid 0 is NOT raid.
Wraith
Bettyswollocks
Is it not? Forgive me for asking but isn't RAID or Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks when in RAID still RAID..
You get the full benefits including performance gains of RAID 0, which is striping drives or doubling your capacity across drives (merging the total capacity of all drives) the only problem is if one of the drives fails you lose the lot.
It's still RAID.
BigDaddyKong
Active member
Eh, that is what a NAS is for.
AlienALX
Well-known member
'sake. Plus.One. IMO anything that combines more than one hard drive to me is RAID. Whether totally technically accurate or not. My Asus RAIDR is a RAID array, with two separate 128gb SSDs combined together into one drive.
NeverBackDown
AMD Enthusiast
Raid 0 is not a Raid?
That's like saying a tree isn't a tree but a large flower
Dude is entitled to his opinion of course but if you took a basic Computer Science course you would learn about Raid 0/1/10 at the least on a binary level. So yes Raid 0 is still a type of Raid.
That's like saying a tree isn't a tree but a large flower
Dude is entitled to his opinion of course but if you took a basic Computer Science course you would learn about Raid 0/1/10 at the least on a binary level. So yes Raid 0 is still a type of Raid.
S_I_N
New member
as a raider of m.2 drives NO!!! There is no real world difference. Only in benchmarks can you see the speed. Only reason I did it was because at the time I was building my rig my supplier only had a single 256 in stock. The following week he was expecting some more and larger capacities but alas he only received more 256's. So I bought a second one and whallah now they're both in raid 0. But everything I felt in performance going to an m.2 drive didnt not double or feel any faster than the single drive.
Thelosouvlakia
Classy-Fried-Chicken
Raid 0 is not a Raid?
That's like saying a tree isn't a tree but a large flower
Dude is entitled to his opinion of course but if you took a basic Computer Science course you would learn about Raid 0/1/10 at the least on a binary level. So yes Raid 0 is still a type of Raid.
RAID 0 is actually an AID, because redundancy can't be achieved
Korreborg
Member
Off topic
No RAID says nothing about redundancy.
People just mistake this because the mistake redundant for being interchangeable with redundancy.
RAID just mean that there is more than one disk. Redundant can be seen as; not strictly necessary to functioning = One disk would handle the task of storring the data.
Then by having more than one, there is a number of options. Redundancy or Performance. Or with more than 2 disks both.
On topic.
We tested the loading in Wildlands, i had a normal SSD, and my friend had a NVME.
It was 1-2 sekunds, and i had a i5-4670k with DDR3, he had a i7-6700k with DDR4, so the difference is negligible.
No RAID says nothing about redundancy.
People just mistake this because the mistake redundant for being interchangeable with redundancy.
RAID just mean that there is more than one disk. Redundant can be seen as; not strictly necessary to functioning = One disk would handle the task of storring the data.
Then by having more than one, there is a number of options. Redundancy or Performance. Or with more than 2 disks both.
On topic.
We tested the loading in Wildlands, i had a normal SSD, and my friend had a NVME.
It was 1-2 sekunds, and i had a i5-4670k with DDR3, he had a i7-6700k with DDR4, so the difference is negligible.
