AMD R9 Fury X benchmarks leaked, Significantly Faster than the GTX 980Ti

We're basically get "Nearly" 980 Ti/Titan X performance for much less and much quieter and cooler, Not a bad thing at all.

Depending on Toms review I might get one for fun :)

I may get one and include it in my loop just to see how well it overclocks :)
 
Only thing left to bi*** about is power consumption and theoretical OC potential. Oh and dont forget the "IT NEEDS A FRIGGIN AIO JUST TO COOL IT" crap.
 
Only thing left to bi*** about is power consumption and theoretical OC potential. Oh and dont forget the "IT NEEDS A FRIGGIN AIO JUST TO COOL IT" crap.

I don't care about temps, Power consumption or noise levels, Well as long as it doesn't consume the same as a 295X2, That thing was horrendous in that department ^_^
 
I don't care about temps, Power consumption or noise levels, Well as long as it doesn't consume the same as a 295X2, That thing was horrendous in that department ^_^


This is one to take all the points on board and not just focus on one thing IMHO.

Its a mixed bag.
 
I'm pretty sure AMD was forced to put an AIO to keep the whole die cool: memory is more sensitive to temperature than GPU cores and probably HBM is even more delicate
 
I'm pretty sure AMD was forced to put an AIO to keep the whole die cool: memory is more sensitive to temperature than GPU cores and probably HBM is even more delicate

We'll find out in the next 30 minutes but based off of the info the AMD rep told people on the OCUK forums the overclocking ability is locked on the memory, Only the core clock can be altered.
 
We'll find out in the next 30 minutes but based off of the info the AMD rep told people on the OCUK forums the overclocking ability is locked on the memory, Only the core clock can be altered.

Already know that, I wasn't talking about memory OC
 
Back
Top