WYP
News Guru
Performance number for AMD's R9 390X and Nvidia's GTX 980 Ti have been leaked and compared.
Read more on this R9 390X GTX Titan X showdown here.
Read more on this R9 390X GTX Titan X showdown here.
AMD R9 390X VS GTX 980 Ti Performance Leak
- Thread starter WYP
- Start date
AverageNinja
Average Penis Too
I really hope these are legit. AMD needs a beast of a card like this to compete with team Green.
Power Consumption still on the high side it seems though.
Power Consumption still on the high side it seems though.
Xploited Titan
New member
I sincerely got trouble with those graphs (like the SSD ones).
I know those cards are optimized for UHD/4K, but performing better on 4K (8.3M pixel resolution) benchmarks vs qHD (4M pixel resolution)? (+9 fps for 390X, +10 fps on Titan X)
There's a big problem right there...
I know those cards are optimized for UHD/4K, but performing better on 4K (8.3M pixel resolution) benchmarks vs qHD (4M pixel resolution)? (+9 fps for 390X, +10 fps on Titan X)
There's a big problem right there...
Dicehunter
Resident Newb
The memory seems a little odd to me, 4GB ?
8GB should start to be the norm IMO, Hell I've seen Shadow of Mordor use 8.30GB at 1440P max settings on my work mates Titan X rig.
8GB should start to be the norm IMO, Hell I've seen Shadow of Mordor use 8.30GB at 1440P max settings on my work mates Titan X rig.
Dawelio
Active member
^ +1... I agree, 8GB should start to be the new norm or standard in graphics card, especially considering and looking at how rapidly games in terms of graphics are evolving and getting more and more power hungry for VRAM.
barnsley
born in a.....
The game adjusts itself around the amount of vram. It won't max it out, it'll just use as much as it can. For most people with the ultra texture pack and 4gb vram it seems to use 3.5GB. I do agree with you though 6/8gb should start to be the norm.
I think this is all BS as I'm sure they'd do an 8gb card as standard, maybe the 390 will have 4 or 6 and that'll be what separates the two? AMD have always been the ones to put more vram in their cards, atleast with the last two generations. I doubt they'd skimp on it now, especially seeing that the 8GB card was the card to have for 4k (if you didn't have a hardon for Nvidia) pre Titan.
The_Governour
New member
+1 so true - also I wont go for any rumors any longer as I will wait for the official results!
Might not be long. Also theres info in them thats only come out recently - its why I let the boys run them.
Certain things in those graphs are spot on
Gilles3000
New member
O come on guys, these are ancient rumors and have already been confirmed to be fake.
Check your sources.
Check your sources.
Graphs are indeed probably fake. The 4k performance is out of the spot. Now, about the vram, dont forgetcthe fact that amd will use hbm with much higher bandwidth, which coupled with some sort of smart compressing algorithm of some sort might actually result in the card being a le to run at 4k or qhd with less vram. I dunno, possiblities are enendless, and its fini so its new. Poser consumption is improved for amd compared to thd previous models, so itsdefinately better. Anyway, it all goes down to computex.
EXACTLY! i noticed that too, seems abit fishy
The chart is a percentage of performance difference to the 290X, not a framerate. With that in mind, the charts are possible.
